5.5 sec in total
335 ms
4.8 sec
327 ms
Visit caet.net now to see the best up-to-date Caet content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about caet.net
CHRISTUS Health and CardiaStream partnered to form the largest cardiology group in East Texas. This partnership combines more than 250 years of practice-based cardiac care with world-class care from C...
Visit caet.netWe analyzed Caet.net page load time and found that the first response time was 335 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
caet.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
8/100
10%
Value6.4 s
9/100
25%
Value18.8 s
0/100
10%
Value300 ms
78/100
30%
Value1.402
0/100
15%
Value19.1 s
3/100
10%
335 ms
552 ms
473 ms
57 ms
75 ms
Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Caet.net, 74% (81 requests) were made to Cardiastream.com and 11% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Cardiastream.com.
Page size can be reduced by 261.3 kB (7%)
3.5 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Caet.net main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 119.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 141.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Caet images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 139 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (80%)
92
18
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Caet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
caet.net
335 ms
cardiastream.com
552 ms
style.min.css
473 ms
tooltipster.css
57 ms
tooltipster-light.css
75 ms
animations.css
76 ms
booked.css
96 ms
rs6.css
85 ms
wp-video-popup.css
113 ms
style.css
134 ms
gutenberg.min.css
333 ms
karma-cherry.css
159 ms
secondary-orange.css
121 ms
_font-awesome.css
173 ms
_mobile.css
177 ms
js_composer.min.css
204 ms
jquery.qtip.css
287 ms
style.css
420 ms
css
63 ms
css
75 ms
style.css
198 ms
responsive.css
287 ms
pum-site-styles.css
288 ms
style.css
513 ms
Defaults.css
292 ms
style.min.css
321 ms
animate.min.css
618 ms
tooltip.min.css
359 ms
jquery.min.js
373 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
613 ms
wpgmza_data.js
415 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
735 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
734 ms
custom.min.js
446 ms
js
80 ms
css
88 ms
js
104 ms
css
85 ms
background-style.min.css
755 ms
core.min.js
589 ms
datepicker.min.js
729 ms
spin.min.js
752 ms
spin.jquery.js
938 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
772 ms
functions.js
736 ms
rbtools.min.js
1100 ms
rs6.min.js
1116 ms
wp-video-popup.js
995 ms
functions.js
761 ms
custom-main.js
768 ms
superfish.js
756 ms
retina.js
939 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
907 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
777 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1216 ms
tabs.min.js
819 ms
accordion.min.js
816 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
806 ms
css
28 ms
menu.min.js
872 ms
selectmenu.min.js
1113 ms
mouse.min.js
870 ms
slider.min.js
856 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
838 ms
jquery.costCalculator.min.js
1039 ms
jquery.qtip.min.js
966 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
966 ms
cost_calculator.js
1080 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
957 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
943 ms
SmoothScroll.min.js
1005 ms
ultimate_bg.min.js
1494 ms
scrollWatch.js
1479 ms
mychart.svg
723 ms
ctmf-eps2png.svg
759 ms
CardiaStream_H_RGB-1.svg
1695 ms
TV-spot.jpg
795 ms
teladoc_banner.jpg
1880 ms
CardiaStream_001.jpg
1953 ms
CardiaStream_003.jpg
1952 ms
CAET_179rt-8x12_Revised-scaled.jpg
1902 ms
icons-04-200x200.png
1768 ms
icons-05-200x200.png
1767 ms
analytics.js
165 ms
icons-06-200x200.png
2018 ms
CardiaStream_H-white.svg
1787 ms
CS_logo3d-300x127.png
1971 ms
bg-div-main.png
1936 ms
css
188 ms
collect
191 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1754 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
115 ms
Defaults.woff
1351 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
55 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
48 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
940 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
965 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
966 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
1016 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf
1014 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
1014 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf
1015 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf
1121 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf
1127 ms
js
1048 ms
gtm.js
1133 ms
conversion_async.js
929 ms
59 ms
65 ms
caet.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
caet.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
caet.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Caet.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Caet.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
caet.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Caet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: