2.6 sec in total
188 ms
1.8 sec
669 ms
Welcome to callsign.com homepage info - get ready to check Callsign best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about callsign.com
Marking a new era in passive authentication, fraud prevention and intelligence. We make digital identity simple and more secure.
Visit callsign.comWe analyzed Callsign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 188 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
callsign.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value1,990 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.436
21/100
15%
Value16.2 s
6/100
10%
188 ms
903 ms
22 ms
49 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Callsign.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (903 ms) belongs to the original domain Callsign.com.
Page size can be reduced by 417.6 kB (27%)
1.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Callsign.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 963.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Callsign images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 205.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 205.2 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Callsign.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 169.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (59%)
39
16
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Callsign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
callsign.com
188 ms
www.callsign.com
903 ms
custom.css
22 ms
twiget.css
49 ms
styles.css
49 ms
style.css
54 ms
jquery.js
49 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
49 ms
twiget.js
53 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
71 ms
jquery.min.js
96 ms
velocity.js
53 ms
classie.js
54 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
51 ms
retina.js
67 ms
navbar.js
67 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
65 ms
mobnav.js
66 ms
jquery.form.min.js
64 ms
scripts.js
64 ms
wp-embed.min.js
70 ms
css
83 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
168 ms
widgets.js
297 ms
analytics.js
226 ms
www.callsign.com
339 ms
callsign-logo-white.png
170 ms
callsign-logo-white-sm.png
171 ms
bars.png
170 ms
crossbars.png
171 ms
pinscreen-office-365.jpg
205 ms
apple_store_btn.png
172 ms
android_store_btn.png
174 ms
2_up_phones.png
243 ms
video_placeholder.jpg
277 ms
ajax-loader.gif
173 ms
ajax-loader.gif
203 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
241 ms
vzIUHo9z-oJ4WgkpPOtg1_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
243 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
277 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
310 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
308 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
309 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
240 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
9 ms
collect
103 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
34 ms
dark-bottom.css
12 ms
callsign.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
callsign.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
callsign.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Callsign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Callsign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
callsign.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Callsign. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: