9.5 sec in total
70 ms
5.7 sec
3.8 sec
Welcome to carltonreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Carlton Review best content right away, or after learning these important things about carltonreview.com
Carlton Realty has adapted our marketing and resources to benefit the Northwest Arkansas current market environment for real estate.
Visit carltonreview.comWe analyzed Carltonreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 9.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
carltonreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.1 s
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value0
0/100
30%
Value0.036
100/100
15%
Value0
0/100
10%
70 ms
29 ms
107 ms
169 ms
181 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Carltonreview.com, 32% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 27% (26 requests) were made to Static.thesparksite.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 35.9 kB (3%)
1.1 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Carltonreview.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 846.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 299 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 299 B or 41% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Carlton Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 28.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Carltonreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 39% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (61%)
61
24
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Carlton Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
carltonreview.com
70 ms
www.dalecarlton.com
29 ms
www.carltonrealtyinc.com
107 ms
carltonrealtyinc.com
169 ms
webfontloader.js
181 ms
dsidx-icons.css
189 ms
combo-css-pro.css
111 ms
client.css
562 ms
client.css
597 ms
bootstrap.min.css
619 ms
bundle.min.css
677 ms
animate.css
600 ms
client.css
148 ms
client.css
144 ms
client.css
589 ms
client.css
556 ms
client.css
178 ms
style.css
550 ms
style.css
163 ms
jquery.js
723 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
710 ms
combo-js-pro.js
588 ms
core.min.js
722 ms
widget.min.js
722 ms
position.min.js
724 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
987 ms
menu.min.js
977 ms
autocomplete.min.js
976 ms
bundle.min.js
979 ms
plugins.min.js
977 ms
js
583 ms
mouse.min.js
982 ms
resizable.min.js
969 ms
draggable.min.js
968 ms
button.min.js
987 ms
dialog.min.js
986 ms
widget-client.js
987 ms
wp-embed.min.js
995 ms
autocomplete.js
989 ms
autocomplete-mls-number.js
986 ms
css
554 ms
gen_204
407 ms
CR-Large-Square.jpg
530 ms
32865bc0cbc384af9.jpg
110 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf
646 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf
1169 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf
944 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf
644 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdr.ttf
1136 ms
6xKwdSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZZMkids18E.ttf
1157 ms
6xK1dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZ7nsDc.ttf
1156 ms
6xKwdSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZY4lCds18E.ttf
1157 ms
6xKwdSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZZclSds18E.ttf
1161 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
1161 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
1161 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
1160 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
1157 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
1161 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
1179 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf
1179 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf
1179 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0ow.ttf
1179 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf
1178 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
1186 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
1187 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
1186 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
1184 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
1185 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
1186 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf
1190 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
590 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
981 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
983 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
981 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
980 ms
profile-75x75.png
759 ms
matomo.js
1043 ms
Bella-Vista-382x220.jpg
153 ms
Bentonville-382x220.jpg
302 ms
Elkins-382x220.jpg
302 ms
Farmington-382x220.jpg
487 ms
Fayetteville-382x220.jpg
565 ms
Lowell-382x220.jpg
565 ms
Rogers-382x220.jpg
533 ms
Springdale-382x220.jpg
565 ms
West-Fork-382x220.jpg
529 ms
house-2.svg
484 ms
house-3.svg
531 ms
slider-1-960xAUTO.fit.jpg
577 ms
buyer_guide_hero_cover-960xAUTO.fit.jpg
563 ms
buying-home-500x300.jpg
576 ms
buy-rent-500x300.jpg
577 ms
matomo.php
430 ms
7-renos-500x300.jpg
481 ms
client.css
199 ms
carltonreview.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
carltonreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
carltonreview.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Carltonreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Carltonreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
carltonreview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Carlton Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: