4.3 sec in total
71 ms
3.9 sec
378 ms
Click here to check amazing Cddi content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cddi.net
CDDI specializes in Civil Engineering, Land Development Planning, Landscape Architecture, Land Surveying and Geotechnical Engineering.
Visit cddi.netWe analyzed Cddi.net page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
cddi.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
97/100
10%
Value1.4 s
100/100
25%
Value12.1 s
3/100
10%
Value1,830 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.118
85/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
71 ms
2664 ms
51 ms
98 ms
383 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Cddi.net, 26% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Cddi.net.
Page size can be reduced by 282.2 kB (20%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Cddi.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 975.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 119.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cddi needs image optimization as it can save up to 11 B or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 162.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 162.6 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (92%)
52
4
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cddi. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
cddi.net
71 ms
cddi.net
2664 ms
css
51 ms
94636ce08415155c8e7dad83b04b5f9f.css
98 ms
gtm-88eb3aa42bc0364e159e70801e726d7c.js
383 ms
jquery.min.js
71 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
72 ms
widgets.js
68 ms
frontend-gtag.js
65 ms
v4-shims.min.js
230 ms
modernizr-custom.min.js
231 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
229 ms
masonry.min.js
370 ms
plugins.min.js
375 ms
widgets.js
375 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
373 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
370 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
371 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
379 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
412 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
413 ms
index.js
407 ms
rbtools.min.js
406 ms
rs6.min.js
414 ms
wp-ulike.min.js
408 ms
js
88 ms
plugins.min.js
408 ms
scripts.js
409 ms
scripts.min.js
411 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
417 ms
pro-tools.js
415 ms
portfolio.js
414 ms
custom.js
459 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
530 ms
bdt-uikit.min.js
416 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
418 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
417 ms
waypoints.min.js
459 ms
core.min.js
460 ms
swiper.min.js
860 ms
share-link.min.js
471 ms
dialog.min.js
468 ms
frontend.min.js
467 ms
element-pack-site.min.js
795 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
638 ms
frontend.min.js
636 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
504 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
495 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
539 ms
lazyload.min.js
538 ms
dummy.png
536 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
114 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
311 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
488 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
487 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
452 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
487 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
485 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
486 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
489 ms
js
458 ms
ga-575b5480531da4d14e7453e2016fe0bc.js
450 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
369 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
368 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
365 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
366 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
365 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
367 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
368 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
368 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
369 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
370 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
369 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
369 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
369 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
255 ms
linkid.js
104 ms
cddi.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cddi.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
cddi.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cddi.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cddi.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cddi.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cddi. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: