Tools & Wizards About Us
cedeo.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

cedeo.net

Cedeo.net is an IT and high-tech company offering multimedia solutions

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

593 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

221 ms

cedeo.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cedeo.net homepage info - get ready to check Cedeo best content right away, or after learning these important things about cedeo.net

Cedeo.net develops technologies and offers advanced multimedia solutions to improve the business of its clients, through consulting and ad hoc solutions

Visit cedeo.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Cedeo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 593 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cedeo.net performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,900 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.5 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cedeo.net

593 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1161 ms

header1.css

363 ms

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

546 ms

style_responsive.css

359 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Cedeo.net, 16% (9 requests) were made to 0 and 7% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Cedeo.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 216.9 kB (69%)

Content Size

313.3 kB

After Optimization

96.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cedeo.net main page is 313.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 172.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 13.9 kB

  • Original 17.5 kB
  • After minification 11.2 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.3 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 59.0 kB

  • Original 123.2 kB
  • After minification 123.2 kB
  • After compression 64.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.0 kB or 48% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 144.0 kB

  • Original 172.6 kB
  • After minification 172.5 kB
  • After compression 28.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cedeo.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 144.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (67%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cedeo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cedeo.net

cedeo.net

593 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1161 ms

header1.css

header1.css

363 ms

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

546 ms

style_responsive.css

style_responsive.css

359 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

633 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

396 ms

apple-style.css

apple-style.css

743 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

499 ms

effects.css

effects.css

547 ms

style.css

style.css

952 ms

blue.css

blue.css

720 ms

header1-blue.css

header1-blue.css

684 ms

cookieconsent.latest.min.js

cookieconsent.latest.min.js

13 ms

jquery-1.8.2.min.js

jquery-1.8.2.min.js

1250 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

842 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1016 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

989 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

1097 ms

sequence.jquery-min.js

sequence.jquery-min.js

1173 ms

apple-style.js

apple-style.js

1124 ms

back-to-top.js

back-to-top.js

1158 ms

app.js

app.js

1188 ms

css

css

25 ms

css

css

36 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

37 ms

index.html

index.html

258 ms

logo_cedeo2.png

logo_cedeo2.png

221 ms

bg4b.jpg

bg4b.jpg

713 ms

status-bar.png

status-bar.png

258 ms

bt-prev.png

bt-prev.png

284 ms

bt-pause.png

bt-pause.png

284 ms

bt-next.png

bt-next.png

298 ms

about_monitor_wimtrade.png

about_monitor_wimtrade.png

366 ms

about_monitor_wimtv.png

about_monitor_wimtv.png

619 ms

ingestion_adapt.png

ingestion_adapt.png

676 ms

breadcrumbs.png

breadcrumbs.png

664 ms

azienda_innovativa_iTo.png

azienda_innovativa_iTo.png

732 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

713 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

21 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

up.png

up.png

522 ms

popcorn-complete.min.js

popcorn-complete.min.js

168 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

54 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

60 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

60 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

59 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

58 ms

custom-video-player.css

custom-video-player.css

253 ms

custom-video-player.js

custom-video-player.js

268 ms

index.js

index.js

269 ms

main.css

main.css

282 ms

fullscreen.css

fullscreen.css

284 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

322 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

439 ms

Accessibility Review

cedeo.net accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cedeo.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cedeo.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cedeo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cedeo.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cedeo.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cedeo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: