Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

charleshaskell.com

Charles Haskell Attorney | CharlesHaskell.com | United States

Page Load Speed

902 ms in total

First Response

58 ms

Resources Loaded

781 ms

Page Rendered

63 ms

charleshaskell.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Charles Haskell content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about charleshaskell.com

The Law Offices of Charles R. Haskell can help with all your legal needs. Find us at charleshaskell.com

Visit charleshaskell.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Charleshaskell.com page load time and found that the first response time was 58 ms and then it took 844 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

charleshaskell.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.charleshaskell.com

58 ms

minified.js

41 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

37 ms

polyfill.min.js

78 ms

thunderbolt-commons.24e46262.bundle.min.js

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Charleshaskell.com, 36% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 31% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (327 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 378.2 kB (50%)

Content Size

760.2 kB

After Optimization

381.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Charleshaskell.com main page is 760.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 471.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 366.2 kB

  • Original 471.0 kB
  • After minification 469.4 kB
  • After compression 104.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 366.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 66.2 kB
  • After minification 56.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Charles Haskell needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 222.9 kB
  • After minification 222.9 kB
  • After compression 220.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (42%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charles Haskell. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

charleshaskell.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

charleshaskell.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

charleshaskell.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charleshaskell.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Charleshaskell.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Charles Haskell. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: