7.2 sec in total
2.4 sec
4.7 sec
113 ms
Visit charlieritch.com now to see the best up-to-date Charlie Ritch content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about charlieritch.com
Visit charlieritch.comWe analyzed Charlieritch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
charlieritch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value16.7 s
0/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
2358 ms
343 ms
233 ms
365 ms
253 ms
Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Charlieritch.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Realestateblogthemes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Charlieritch.com.
Page size can be reduced by 80.1 kB (33%)
243.1 kB
163.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Charlieritch.com main page is 243.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 127.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Charlie Ritch images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 48.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Charlieritch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (26%)
19
14
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charlie Ritch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.charlieritch.com
2358 ms
style.css
343 ms
riw.css
233 ms
client.css
365 ms
styles.css
253 ms
sociable.css
241 ms
pagenavi-css.css
331 ms
jquery.js
865 ms
wpsf-js.php
932 ms
ga.js
4 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
back_all.jpg
289 ms
header.jpg
332 ms
buttons.jpg
194 ms
top1.gif
115 ms
title.gif
140 ms
genImage.php
914 ms
genImage.php
885 ms
title_back.gif
288 ms
date.gif
381 ms
index.php
1051 ms
comment.gif
95 ms
bottom.gif
97 ms
charlieritch.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
charlieritch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
charlieritch.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charlieritch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Charlieritch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
charlieritch.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Charlie Ritch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: