1.9 sec in total
327 ms
1.3 sec
216 ms
Welcome to checkcosmetic.net homepage info - get ready to check Check Cosmetic best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about checkcosmetic.net
Check your cosmetics against Cosmetic Calculator and identify the production and expiration date of your beauty product by the batch code.
Visit checkcosmetic.netWe analyzed Checkcosmetic.net page load time and found that the first response time was 327 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
checkcosmetic.net performance score
327 ms
97 ms
8 ms
197 ms
194 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Checkcosmetic.net, 13% (10 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 10% (8 requests) were made to S0.2mdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (327 ms) belongs to the original domain Checkcosmetic.net.
Page size can be reduced by 853.1 kB (55%)
1.5 MB
687.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Checkcosmetic.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Check Cosmetic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 806.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 806.4 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Checkcosmetic.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (68%)
77
25
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Check Cosmetic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
checkcosmetic.net
327 ms
style.css
97 ms
jquery.min.js
8 ms
formhelper.js
197 ms
jquery.autocomplete.min.js
194 ms
processor.js
192 ms
plusone.js
82 ms
show_ads.js
9 ms
widgets.js
8 ms
ga.js
74 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
67 ms
ca-pub-1864003164766740.js
159 ms
zrt_lookup.html
154 ms
show_ads_impl.js
122 ms
header.jpg
216 ms
tpmn.jpg
129 ms
cntbg.jpg
129 ms
expire_date_bourjois.jpg
128 ms
expire_date_guerlain.jpg
199 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
102 ms
fastbutton
140 ms
decoder.php
181 ms
button.3ccb64e61d4c01fae12cd2b0ed9b2bab.js
107 ms
__utm.gif
65 ms
footer.jpg
124 ms
contactus.png
124 ms
like.php
105 ms
ads
208 ms
osd.js
33 ms
ads
208 ms
postmessageRelay
74 ms
tweet_button.f8c8d971a6ac545cf416e3c1ad4bbc65.en.html
22 ms
rs=AGLTcCOnDxwX8-LbpDmaxOBIoHm7W_kGNA
29 ms
4qFiRLLPSF7.js
56 ms
lH1ibRl5GKq.png
52 ms
971028622-postmessagerelay.js
46 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
101 ms
jot
118 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
23 ms
5110860585802469416
76 ms
abg.js
55 ms
m_js_controller.js
79 ms
m_window_focus_non_hydra.js
78 ms
osd_listener.js
86 ms
m_qs_click_protection.js
78 ms
x_button_blue2.svg
105 ms
aclk
142 ms
skeleton.js
124 ms
iconx2-000000.png
42 ms
googlelogo_dark_color_84x28dp.png
58 ms
s
35 ms
redir.html
74 ms
transparent.png
11 ms
iframe.html
44 ms
T8Ys39_ecZUP0z5o0qwgiftCx6c5Z_CDv350QIo51NY.js
40 ms
html_inpage_rendering_lib_200_203.js
71 ms
d5qAyLYU.js
36 ms
dt
77 ms
9im3l02I.html
28 ms
skeleton.js
56 ms
antenna2.js
46 ms
durly.js
33 ms
lidar.js
8 ms
index.html
21 ms
beacon
46 ms
g-1348.xgi
71 ms
css
47 ms
css
60 ms
style.min.css
14 ms
Enabler_01_176.js
27 ms
dynamic.min.js
27 ms
canvas.min.js
28 ms
animations.min.js
30 ms
logic.min.js
27 ms
4.gif
5 ms
ba.js
7 ms
1211.js
10 ms
p2
11 ms
checkcosmetic.net SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkcosmetic.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Checkcosmetic.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
checkcosmetic.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Check Cosmetic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: