Tools & Wizards About Us
checkers.ws screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 58

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 25% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

checkers.ws

Checkers Online and other Board Games Online. Play free internet checkers

Page Load Speed

34.7 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

21.7 sec

Page Rendered

11.6 sec

checkers.ws screenshot

About Website

Visit checkers.ws now to see the best up-to-date Checkers content for Chile and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about checkers.ws

Checkers Online, chinese checkers and other free board games to play in the internet: Othello, reversi, go, mahjong, chess, gomoku, connect 4, hexxagon. Games for two players or play solitaire against...

Visit checkers.ws

Key Findings

We analyzed Checkers.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 33.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

checkers.ws performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

90/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,500 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.047

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

checkers.ws

1405 ms

ga.js

187 ms

show_ads.js

187 ms

checkers.gif

2153 ms

ca-pub-7524497347282676.js

3374 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Checkers.ws, 10% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source S16.sitemeter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 432.2 kB (48%)

Content Size

906.4 kB

After Optimization

474.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Checkers.ws main page is 906.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 807.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 31.3 kB

  • Original 37.8 kB
  • After minification 31.7 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 61.2 kB
  • After minification 59.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Checkers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 399.2 kB

  • Original 807.3 kB
  • After minification 792.1 kB
  • After compression 408.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 399.2 kB or 49% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (54%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Checkers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

checkers.ws

checkers.ws

1405 ms

ga.js

ga.js

187 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

187 ms

checkers.gif

checkers.gif

2153 ms

ca-pub-7524497347282676.js

ca-pub-7524497347282676.js

3374 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

3538 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

1794 ms

pubcode.min.js

pubcode.min.js

3009 ms

counter.js

counter.js

20279 ms

checkers_solitario00.gif

checkers_solitario00.gif

2913 ms

checkers00.gif

checkers00.gif

2977 ms

checkers1.gif

checkers1.gif

2913 ms

checkers_01.gif

checkers_01.gif

2913 ms

checkers_online.gif

checkers_online.gif

2913 ms

chinese1.gif

chinese1.gif

2912 ms

blobs50b.gif

blobs50b.gif

2975 ms

hishi50.gif

hishi50.gif

2976 ms

domino50.gif

domino50.gif

2976 ms

game50a.gif

game50a.gif

2976 ms

chess50a.gif

chess50a.gif

3004 ms

connect4.gif

connect4.gif

3034 ms

iq50e.gif

iq50e.gif

2743 ms

lights50c.gif

lights50c.gif

2744 ms

mahjong50.jpg

mahjong50.jpg

2743 ms

connect4_3d50b.gif

connect4_3d50b.gif

2715 ms

chess_2.gif

chess_2.gif

2715 ms

hexxagon50a.gif

hexxagon50a.gif

3630 ms

go50.gif

go50.gif

3629 ms

gomoku50a.gif

gomoku50a.gif

3628 ms

war_game.gif

war_game.gif

3629 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

1677 ms

ads

ads

1307 ms

osd.js

osd.js

188 ms

get.media

get.media

1006 ms

sd

sd

210 ms

728x90.htm

728x90.htm

681 ms

ads

ads

482 ms

728x90.gif

728x90.gif

1168 ms

120x600.htm

120x600.htm

824 ms

get.media

get.media

75 ms

17-TLG-300x250[2].jpg

17-TLG-300x250[2].jpg

671 ms

120x600.gif

120x600.gif

146 ms

Accessibility Review

checkers.ws accessibility score

58

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

checkers.ws best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

checkers.ws SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkers.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Checkers.ws main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

checkers.ws

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Checkers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: