8.1 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.7 sec
3.3 sec
Visit cheltenham52.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Cheltenham 52 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cheltenham52.co.uk
A social project to share a different bit of Cheltenham each week... ...and unearth the town's hidden gems!
Visit cheltenham52.co.ukWe analyzed Cheltenham52.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
cheltenham52.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.6 s
0/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value6,560 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value22.4 s
1/100
10%
1053 ms
166 ms
218 ms
224 ms
218 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Cheltenham52.co.uk, 10% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Cheltenham52.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 156.0 kB (9%)
1.8 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Cheltenham52.co.uk main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cheltenham 52 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cheltenham52.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (68%)
85
27
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cheltenham 52. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cheltenham52.co.uk
1053 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
166 ms
add-link-to-facebook.css
218 ms
styles.css
224 ms
form_style.css
218 ms
settings.css
218 ms
js_composer.min.css
378 ms
bootstrap.min.css
304 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
331 ms
font-awesome.min.css
327 ms
ionicons.min.css
331 ms
elusive-webfont.css
318 ms
mfglabs_iconset.css
611 ms
monosocialiconsfont.css
618 ms
swipebox.css
622 ms
magnific-popup.css
608 ms
owl.carousel.css
617 ms
static-captions.css
604 ms
css
94 ms
style.css
778 ms
css
94 ms
jetpack.css
683 ms
jquery.js
771 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
678 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
766 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
675 ms
picturefill.min.js
754 ms
modernizr-2.7.1.min.js
754 ms
prettyPhoto.min.css
745 ms
scripts.js
1201 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
135 ms
gprofiles.js
43 ms
wpgroho.js
1212 ms
bootstrap.js
1217 ms
plugins.min.js
1298 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
1217 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1218 ms
jquery.history.min.js
1286 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1293 ms
core.min.js
1294 ms
e-202241.js
536 ms
widget.min.js
1261 ms
tabs.min.js
1262 ms
jquery-ui-tabs-rotate.min.js
1192 ms
mouse.min.js
1194 ms
sortable.min.js
1188 ms
draggable.min.js
1190 ms
droppable.min.js
1091 ms
accordion.min.js
1069 ms
position.min.js
1066 ms
menu.min.js
1037 ms
wp-a11y.min.js
1040 ms
autocomplete.min.js
790 ms
waypoints.min.js
775 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
775 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
770 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
770 ms
main.min.js
769 ms
wp-embed.min.js
768 ms
Chelt52-small.png
316 ms
1.jpg
318 ms
bg_line.png
311 ms
Chelt52-large.png
315 ms
full-screen-background.jpg
312 ms
about.png
311 ms
KNZL9bia.png
489 ms
15801452_10158003389505072_1868976066_n.jpg
313 ms
2.jpg
370 ms
THIS-WEEK.png
308 ms
the52-2.png
306 ms
as.png
361 ms
glos.jpg
363 ms
rsz_gloslive.jpg
293 ms
gns.jpg
288 ms
soglos.png
349 ms
wgs.jpg
350 ms
echo.png
347 ms
background.jpg
528 ms
vince.png
530 ms
glos_police.png
380 ms
key_Martin_Horwood.png
515 ms
QLSmeA_T.jpg
379 ms
articles.png
514 ms
media-pack.png
513 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
37 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
32 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
37 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
36 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
35 ms
MonoSocialIconsFont-1.10.woff
902 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexg.woff
34 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexg.woff
35 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexg.woff
37 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexg.woff
37 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexg.woff
37 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
897 ms
ionicons.ttf
890 ms
hovercard.min.css
494 ms
services.min.css
509 ms
cheltenham52.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
cheltenham52.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
cheltenham52.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cheltenham52.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cheltenham52.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cheltenham52.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cheltenham 52. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: