7.5 sec in total
170 ms
6.2 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Chic Web content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chicweb.ca
Chic Web provide web services: graphic design, hosting, developer, builder, SEO, support and outsourced. We have more than 20 years of experience.
Visit chicweb.caWe analyzed Chicweb.ca page load time and found that the first response time was 170 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
chicweb.ca performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value28.2 s
0/100
25%
Value52.4 s
0/100
10%
Value34,690 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.03
100/100
15%
Value51.4 s
0/100
10%
170 ms
1753 ms
247 ms
1105 ms
184 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Chicweb.ca, 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Chicweb.ca.
Page size can be reduced by 149.5 kB (11%)
1.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Chicweb.ca main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 643.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chic Web images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 565 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chicweb.ca has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (81%)
83
16
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chic Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 68 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
chicweb.ca
170 ms
chicweb.ca
1753 ms
autoptimize_8445dbb72dddbb0f76b1b5940485f909.css
247 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1105 ms
jquery.min.js
184 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
182 ms
jquery-jvectormap-2.0.3.min.js
177 ms
revolution.tools.min.js
178 ms
rs6.min.js
862 ms
autoptimize_single_a8b6bfbc76f3942076078846f8d67d93.js
852 ms
flatpickr.min.js
851 ms
select2.min.js
851 ms
autoptimize_single_10dd25f7c662d162d2138aa8e4ab2eea.js
862 ms
js
216 ms
revolution.tools.min.js
1316 ms
rs6.min.js
1312 ms
shell.js
858 ms
core.min.js
1072 ms
datepicker.min.js
1072 ms
spin.min.js
1046 ms
autoptimize_single_9504049571835239df2ba0ac2ead52db.js
1047 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
1049 ms
autoptimize_single_74c7e792153dade3f4e104bc3ebb4bbb.js
1239 ms
7432591.js
803 ms
autoptimize_single_573207a17518a8539ba8b567ed4d4482.js
1235 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1240 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
1244 ms
js.cookie.min.js
1261 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1263 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
1265 ms
push.min.js
1266 ms
Luminous.min.js
1266 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
1269 ms
autoptimize_single_b6ea9690a38f64eb07cd7dca734a0647.js
1269 ms
frontend.min.js
1266 ms
front-scripts.min.js
1269 ms
cart_widget.min.js
1268 ms
anime.min.js
1286 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1286 ms
autoptimize_single_9bc7d55e23250286f5564df4c29cc7f8.js
1289 ms
js
1220 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1287 ms
autoptimize_single_73081a59de431ab9df546962723b2b12.js
1184 ms
autoptimize_single_38fccefec862248d0ad3e56bfb0dce10.js
1184 ms
autoptimize_single_fcec0ee04cea44dbbb5f2d15375ef197.js
1184 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1184 ms
jquery.localscroll.min.js
559 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
512 ms
jquery.scrollbar.min.js
510 ms
autoptimize_single_2c2147f4b883a413dac32e3058dd3a1a.js
503 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
503 ms
bootstrap-progressbar.min.js
501 ms
autoptimize_single_4bb716d526d4000d88245c13859db636.js
290 ms
autoptimize_single_f81c3c778084503cad39095830c6b3f1.js
290 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
289 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
289 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
287 ms
webfont.js
423 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
385 ms
autoptimize_single_152c03e08ca4b979cde26cabb1649eec.js
375 ms
autoptimize_single_2dd8534c8e311e058bd6732eace3b4af.js
367 ms
autoptimize_single_64b34ac955c8c6359f50cc9f29d7988f.js
362 ms
autoptimize_single_00b1acd8ca15c7bd08f6bd523f5b2b04.js
362 ms
autoptimize_single_a3714ee1cf4278c5d1440f6d74db88c3.js
353 ms
underscore.min.js
355 ms
autoptimize_single_cf04d19a29ea59810e8ae0fb82ca0e51.js
349 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
348 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
348 ms
dummy.png
345 ms
analytics.js
383 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
135 ms
css
126 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
129 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
130 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff
1402 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
1404 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
1411 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
1407 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
1404 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
1408 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
1408 ms
texture.png
1374 ms
security-department-1653345_1280.png
1628 ms
collect
1179 ms
json
1268 ms
footer_alt_bg.jpg
1135 ms
footer_bg.png
1156 ms
gen_204
535 ms
socicon.woff
706 ms
imageedit_3_4171086557w.png
705 ms
transparent.png
281 ms
pattern.png
283 ms
mouse_icon.png
281 ms
slide_02.jpg
263 ms
json
211 ms
common.js
59 ms
util.js
57 ms
map.js
34 ms
marker.js
40 ms
revicons.woff
90 ms
chicweb.ca accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
chicweb.ca SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chicweb.ca can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chicweb.ca main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chicweb.ca
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chic Web. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: