Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 51

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

chimpelectronics.com

Chimp's Electronics Resource Guides and Information

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

282 ms

chimpelectronics.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to chimpelectronics.com homepage info - get ready to check Chimp Electronics best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about chimpelectronics.com

If you need a new electronic item and are unsure about your options, check out our blog posts for more info. You can then make a wise purchasing decision.

Visit chimpelectronics.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chimpelectronics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chimpelectronics.com performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.088

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.chimpelectronics.com

1217 ms

styles.css

104 ms

widgets.css

172 ms

cloud-zoom.css

175 ms

vertnav.css

179 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Chimpelectronics.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Chimpelectronics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 605.1 kB (42%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

834.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Chimpelectronics.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 809.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 43.0 kB

  • Original 49.3 kB
  • After minification 34.9 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.4 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 111.8 kB

  • Original 809.0 kB
  • After minification 697.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Chimp Electronics needs image optimization as it can save up to 111.8 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 351.5 kB

  • Original 464.7 kB
  • After minification 357.2 kB
  • After compression 113.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 351.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 98.9 kB

  • Original 116.5 kB
  • After minification 88.7 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chimpelectronics.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 98.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (38%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chimp Electronics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

chimpelectronics.com accessibility score

51

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

chimpelectronics.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

chimpelectronics.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chimpelectronics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chimpelectronics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chimp Electronics. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: