1.8 sec in total
39 ms
1.6 sec
191 ms
Visit choiceanalytical.com now to see the best up-to-date Choice Analytical content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about choiceanalytical.com
Choice Analytical supplies the most innovative fuel analysis instrumentation for the Petroleum, Petrochemical and Bio-fuel industries.
Visit choiceanalytical.comWe analyzed Choiceanalytical.com page load time and found that the first response time was 39 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
choiceanalytical.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value21.4 s
0/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value700 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.399
25/100
15%
Value12.7 s
14/100
10%
39 ms
40 ms
5 ms
11 ms
22 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Choiceanalytical.com, 41% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (252 ms) belongs to the original domain Choiceanalytical.com.
Page size can be reduced by 549.5 kB (32%)
1.7 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Choiceanalytical.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 227.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 227.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 310.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Choice Analytical needs image optimization as it can save up to 310.9 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 377 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choiceanalytical.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (42%)
33
19
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choice Analytical. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.choiceanalytical.com
39 ms
css
40 ms
font-awesome.min.css
5 ms
mystickyelements-front.min.css
11 ms
intlTelInput.css
22 ms
js
77 ms
jquery.min.js
22 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
21 ms
scripts.min.js
25 ms
common.js
22 ms
intlTelInput.js
25 ms
jquery.cookie.js
252 ms
mailcheck.js
236 ms
jquery.email-autocomplete.js
22 ms
mystickyelements-fronted.min.js
24 ms
et-divi-dynamic-7-late.css
225 ms
Choice-Analytical-logo-1.jpg
8 ms
Clarity_Choice_hz_front_reduced.jpg
6 ms
Color_Choice_hz_front_reduced.jpg
7 ms
Petra-Max-AS.jsa_.jpg
6 ms
Bag-SindieCl-side-right.jpg
10 ms
RSeries_Clora_CMS-600x600-1.jpeg
8 ms
Sindie-2622-250-1.jpg
9 ms
1152-Sealed-Unit-Front-View-200x300.jpg
10 ms
1140-Microsep-300x300.jpg
11 ms
K60002.jpg
12 ms
K71000-Var0.jpg
12 ms
K77000.jpg
14 ms
Emcee-Logo.jpg
15 ms
Koehler-Logo.jpg
13 ms
XOS-logo.jpg
15 ms
gcc-logo-horiz-tagline-rgb-high-res.jpg
15 ms
1fa3726b8e9afe929b58254e10454b77_JWMarriottAustin.jpeg
46 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
44 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
88 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
132 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
146 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
140 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
140 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
145 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
145 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
145 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
155 ms
modules.woff
5 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exg.woff
32 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf
32 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exg.woff
23 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exQ.ttf
32 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exg.woff
32 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exQ.ttf
38 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exg.woff
41 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf
39 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWV4exg.woff
39 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWV4exQ.ttf
39 ms
style.min.css
32 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
27 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
26 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
25 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
24 ms
choiceanalytical.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
choiceanalytical.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
choiceanalytical.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choiceanalytical.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Choiceanalytical.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
choiceanalytical.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Choice Analytical. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: