3.3 sec in total
906 ms
2.1 sec
277 ms
Click here to check amazing Christ Church content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about christchurch.bm
Visit christchurch.bmWe analyzed Christchurch.bm page load time and found that the first response time was 906 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
christchurch.bm performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
17/100
10%
Value15.5 s
0/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value1,310 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.027
100/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
906 ms
102 ms
99 ms
105 ms
128 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Christchurch.bm, 75% (52 requests) were made to Eadn-wc01-6080540.nxedge.io and 14% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (906 ms) belongs to the original domain Christchurch.bm.
Page size can be reduced by 192.1 kB (16%)
1.2 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Christchurch.bm main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 667.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 189.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 189.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Christ Church images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 975 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Christchurch.bm has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (79%)
56
12
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Christ Church. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
christchurch.bm
906 ms
select2.min.css
102 ms
iconfonts.css
99 ms
frontend.min.css
105 ms
tooltip.css
128 ms
tooltipster-sideTip-shadow.min.css
102 ms
featherlight.css
103 ms
lity.min.css
143 ms
mec-general-calendar.css
143 ms
wp_head.css
155 ms
style.css
138 ms
dashicons.min.css
139 ms
css
23 ms
style.min.css
141 ms
jquery.min.js
170 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
180 ms
mec-general-calendar.js
182 ms
tooltip.js
185 ms
frontend.js
212 ms
events.js
189 ms
custom.js
210 ms
js
61 ms
et-core-unified-2.min.css
209 ms
style.min.css
308 ms
style.min.css
309 ms
core.min.js
310 ms
datepicker.min.js
310 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
311 ms
imagesload.js
310 ms
jquery.typewatch.js
310 ms
featherlight.js
311 ms
select2.full.min.js
312 ms
lity.min.js
312 ms
colorbrightness.min.js
356 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
355 ms
rellax.js
356 ms
scripts.min.js
357 ms
smoothscroll.js
355 ms
es6-promise.auto.min.js
356 ms
api.js
51 ms
recaptcha.js
374 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
373 ms
jquery.mobile.js
372 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
372 ms
common.js
350 ms
toolbox-scripts.js
349 ms
ChristChurchTextLogo.svg
329 ms
christ_church.jpg
338 ms
WelcomeToChristChurch_WhiteCoral.svg
331 ms
TOP-RIP.svg
336 ms
BOTTOM-RIP.svg
335 ms
OR-Home.jpg
336 ms
invisi.gif
373 ms
OP-1.jpg
385 ms
LOL-1.jpg
385 ms
BOM_home.jpg
385 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
97 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
183 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf
227 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
226 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf
227 ms
modules.woff
242 ms
VujahdayScript-Regular.ttf
479 ms
recaptcha__en.js
176 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVc.ttf
40 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkaVc.ttf
46 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjaVc.ttf
46 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjaVc.ttf
46 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjaVc.ttf
110 ms
christchurch.bm accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
christchurch.bm best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
christchurch.bm SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Christchurch.bm can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Christchurch.bm main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
christchurch.bm
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Christ Church. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: