7.8 sec in total
383 ms
7.2 sec
238 ms
Click here to check amazing Claytex content for South Africa. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about claytex.com
Modelling and simulation solutions for automotive, aerospace and building systems focused on systems engineering and virtual testing of complex systems
Visit claytex.comWe analyzed Claytex.com page load time and found that the first response time was 383 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
claytex.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.4 s
0/100
10%
Value14.7 s
0/100
25%
Value21.7 s
0/100
10%
Value2,720 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.157
74/100
15%
Value25.2 s
0/100
10%
383 ms
4621 ms
416 ms
370 ms
359 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Claytex.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Claytex.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (33%)
5.6 MB
3.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Claytex.com main page is 5.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 796.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Claytex needs image optimization as it can save up to 796.3 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 300.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 300.4 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 690.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Claytex.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 690.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (60%)
75
30
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Claytex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
claytex.com
383 ms
www.claytex.com
4621 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
416 ms
style.min.css
370 ms
styles.css
359 ms
front.min.css
361 ms
rs6.css
621 ms
bootstrap.min.css
635 ms
app.min.css
839 ms
magnific.css
442 ms
fontello.css
460 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
493 ms
css
31 ms
dynamic.css
948 ms
public.css
539 ms
addtoany.min.css
574 ms
srpw-frontend.css
623 ms
plugins.min.css
738 ms
style.css
697 ms
jquery.min.js
740 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
726 ms
addtoany.min.js
779 ms
front.min.js
809 ms
rbtools.min.js
990 ms
rs6.min.js
1005 ms
init.js
856 ms
modernizr.custom.46504.js
898 ms
st-custom.css
914 ms
style.css
935 ms
functions.php
1032 ms
am-custom.css
1033 ms
font-awesome.css
792 ms
css
15 ms
revolution.addon.particles.css
792 ms
front-flex.min.css
838 ms
scripts.js
837 ms
bootstrap.min.js
837 ms
waypoints.min.js
838 ms
magnific.min.js
864 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.0-packed.js
864 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
827 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
996 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
814 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
801 ms
app.min.js
850 ms
wp-embed.min.js
755 ms
styling.min.js
798 ms
revolution.addon.particles.js
752 ms
page.js
72 ms
Claytex-TECHNIA-COMPANY-RGB-217-90.png
299 ms
alt-background.png
299 ms
dummy.png
300 ms
transparent.png
351 ms
DymolaLogo.jpg
352 ms
Dymola_4_3-768x546.png
610 ms
rfpro_logo.png
354 ms
GRAB_001-768x546.png
846 ms
consulting_4_3-768x546.jpg
607 ms
multirun-1-672x217.png
606 ms
Multirun_4_3-768x546.png
760 ms
Modelica_Libraries-300x143.png
608 ms
LibraryEP.png
692 ms
LibraryCoolingNoBackground.png
690 ms
LibraryNoBackground.png
691 ms
FMI-300x106.png
691 ms
FMIBlockset_4_3-672x477.png
772 ms
Training_4_3-768x546.jpg
776 ms
Reqtify_Sm.jpg
770 ms
Reqtify_4_3-768x546.png
775 ms
AVSandbox-strapline-black-300.png
838 ms
3-rFpro-simulation-with-LiDAR-sensor-model.png
1323 ms
DymolaLogo-Square-150x150.jpg
807 ms
Sky-Taxi-Hover-150x150.png
812 ms
Acceleration-Test-Code-150x150.png
808 ms
IRhybrid-3-150x150.png
873 ms
eso.e18d3993.js
22 ms
SimSpe-150x150.jpg
854 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
77 ms
fontello.woff
630 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
134 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
301 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
321 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
320 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
319 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
642 ms
ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-33mZGCQYag.ttf
321 ms
sm.23.html
220 ms
claytex.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
claytex.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
claytex.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Claytex.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Claytex.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
claytex.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Claytex. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: