1.3 sec in total
103 ms
1.1 sec
69 ms
Visit cleaningjanitorialservices.com now to see the best up-to-date Cleaning Janitorial Services content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cleaningjanitorialservices.com
Partner Solutions feel comfortable in adapting our work to the different types of services and tasks. From carpet cleaning to logistics to painting your covered
Visit cleaningjanitorialservices.comWe analyzed Cleaningjanitorialservices.com page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
cleaningjanitorialservices.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value14.6 s
1/100
10%
Value1,950 ms
8/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.9 s
2/100
10%
103 ms
51 ms
21 ms
23 ms
345 ms
Our browser made a total of 162 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cleaningjanitorialservices.com, 93% (150 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (610 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 698.7 kB (62%)
1.1 MB
423.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Cleaningjanitorialservices.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 82.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 615.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 615.5 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 557 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cleaningjanitorialservices.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 154 (96%)
160
6
The browser has sent 160 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cleaning Janitorial Services. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 149 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
cleaningjanitorialservices.com
103 ms
www.thebostoncleaning.com
51 ms
require.min.js
21 ms
main-r.min.js
23 ms
bt
345 ms
842e9e_fd0999ad71e72eb40cce100a0db4b4f3_434.json.z
610 ms
842e9e_d2731fa5d62c621abc771596e0370d99_434.json.z
606 ms
ugc-viewer
311 ms
bt
354 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
4 ms
lodash.min.js
21 ms
wixCodeInit.min.js
20 ms
coreUtils.js
38 ms
coreUtils.min.js
38 ms
skins.min.js
102 ms
components.min.js
63 ms
core.min.js
101 ms
mobx.umd.min.js
100 ms
mobx-react.min.js
62 ms
TweenMax.min.js
62 ms
animations.min.js
103 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
102 ms
layout.min.js
101 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
271 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
270 ms
container.min.js
271 ms
imageZoom.min.js
294 ms
mediaZoom.min.js
295 ms
imageZoomDisplayer.min.js
294 ms
matrixGallery.min.js
297 ms
slideShowGallery.min.js
297 ms
comboBoxInput.min.js
296 ms
dialogs.min.js
298 ms
table.min.js
296 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
304 ms
tpa.min.js
304 ms
dataFixer.min.js
303 ms
siteUtils.min.js
302 ms
image.min.js
303 ms
balata.min.js
336 ms
translationsUtils.min.js
326 ms
hammer.min.js
334 ms
utils.min.js
325 ms
fonts.min.js
324 ms
platformUtils-bundle.js
333 ms
loggingUtils.min.js
334 ms
imageClientApi.js
331 ms
swfobject.min.js
330 ms
santaProps.min.js
313 ms
displayer.min.js
305 ms
mousetrap.min.js
286 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
288 ms
react-dom.min.js
282 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
252 ms
widgets.min.js
253 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
251 ms
imageCommon.min.js
251 ms
formCommon.min.js
249 ms
textCommon.min.js
82 ms
containerCommon.min.js
82 ms
socialCommon.min.js
82 ms
galleriesCommon.min.js
72 ms
buttonCommon.min.js
59 ms
compDesignUtils.min.js
58 ms
mediaCommon.min.js
56 ms
audioCommon.min.js
57 ms
skinExports.min.js
55 ms
compUtils.min.js
55 ms
mobileLayoutUtils.js
99 ms
pm-rpc.min.js
97 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
91 ms
multilingual.min.js
92 ms
render.min.js
93 ms
color.min.js
93 ms
zepto.min.js
74 ms
xss.min.js
72 ms
bluebird.min.js
71 ms
imageClientApi.min.js
63 ms
column.min.js
63 ms
siteBackground.min.js
63 ms
hoverBox.min.js
63 ms
mediaContainerFactory.min.js
62 ms
internalMarkings.min.js
63 ms
repeater.min.js
62 ms
zoomedImage.min.js
61 ms
menuButton.min.js
62 ms
messageView.min.js
62 ms
backgroundCommon.min.js
42 ms
bt
91 ms
css
87 ms
TweenMax.min.js
26 ms
svgShape.min.js
13 ms
adminLoginButton.min.js
14 ms
wTwitterFollow.min.js
15 ms
facebookComments.min.js
14 ms
verticalAnchorsMenu.min.js
15 ms
facebookShare.min.js
17 ms
vKShareButton.min.js
15 ms
youTubeSubscribeButton.min.js
17 ms
itunesButton.min.js
17 ms
skypeCallButton.min.js
17 ms
fileUploader.min.js
26 ms
pinItPinWidget.min.js
25 ms
popupCloseTextButton.min.js
25 ms
radioButton.min.js
30 ms
radioGroup.min.js
30 ms
documentMedia.min.js
26 ms
datePicker.min.js
35 ms
contactForm.min.js
33 ms
subscribeForm.min.js
33 ms
textArea.min.js
36 ms
loginSocialBar.min.js
35 ms
googleMap.min.js
35 ms
soundCloudWidget.min.js
36 ms
paypalButton.min.js
36 ms
imageButton.min.js
37 ms
linkBar.min.js
41 ms
spotifyPlayer.min.js
37 ms
spotifyFollow.min.js
40 ms
twitterFeed.min.js
39 ms
backToTopButton.min.js
39 ms
svgCommon.min.js
40 ms
facebookLike.min.js
41 ms
facebookLikeBox.min.js
42 ms
flickrBadgeWidget.min.js
42 ms
rssButton.min.js
54 ms
tinyMenu.min.js
50 ms
groupContainer.min.js
50 ms
wGooglePlusOne.min.js
50 ms
pinterestPinIt.min.js
50 ms
pinterestFollow.min.js
48 ms
wTwitterTweet.min.js
49 ms
audioPlayer.min.js
48 ms
loginButton.min.js
50 ms
htmlComponent.min.js
49 ms
deadComponent.min.js
49 ms
mediaPlayer.min.js
42 ms
mediaControls.min.js
42 ms
singleAudioPlayer.min.js
41 ms
quickActionBar.min.js
40 ms
4f27dad728504f15a3000025f55c7e4f.svg
38 ms
3fa973cb949e4e9281730c4e64d7b71e.svg
39 ms
boxSlideShowSlide.min.js
37 ms
stripSlideShowSlide.min.js
38 ms
page.min.js
37 ms
bgImageStrip.min.js
37 ms
popupContainer.min.js
36 ms
stripContainer.min.js
36 ms
stripColumnsContainer.min.js
35 ms
exitMobileModeButton.min.js
36 ms
tpaGalleries.min.js
35 ms
flashComponent.min.js
36 ms
stripSlideShow.min.js
35 ms
mobileActionsMenu.min.js
35 ms
verticalMenu.min.js
33 ms
disqusComments.min.js
34 ms
checkbox.min.js
34 ms
gridComponent.min.js
33 ms
languageSelector.min.js
34 ms
lodash.min.js
33 ms
bt
4 ms
languages.css
59 ms
cleaningjanitorialservices.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
cleaningjanitorialservices.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
cleaningjanitorialservices.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cleaningjanitorialservices.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cleaningjanitorialservices.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cleaningjanitorialservices.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cleaning Janitorial Services. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: