2.8 sec in total
608 ms
2 sec
162 ms
Click here to check amazing Click content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about click.cm
Visit click.cmWe analyzed Click.cm page load time and found that the first response time was 608 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
click.cm performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
90/100
10%
Value1.8 s
99/100
25%
Value2.3 s
98/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
608 ms
338 ms
313 ms
362 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Click.cm, 63% (22 requests) were made to Onamae.com and 23% (8 requests) were made to Cache.img.gmo.jp. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (693 ms) relates to the external source Onamae.com.
Page size can be reduced by 234.5 kB (53%)
443.8 kB
209.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Click.cm main page is 443.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 193.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.0 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Click needs image optimization as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 128.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 128.8 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Click.cm needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (35%)
34
22
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Click. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
click.cm
608 ms
setstyle.css
338 ms
logo.gif
313 ms
parking.html
362 ms
gtm.js
25 ms
this.css
620 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
674 ms
jquery.cookie.js
333 ms
search_textarea.js
342 ms
script.js
519 ms
script_slider.js
387 ms
mainVisual_slider.js
500 ms
accordion.js
512 ms
popup.js
578 ms
jquery.infieldlabel.min.js
666 ms
typed.js
685 ms
countdown.min.js
693 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
collect
15 ms
camp_bg_kuma.jpg
82 ms
title.png
160 ms
midasi.png
173 ms
btn01.png
171 ms
btn02.png
179 ms
btn03.png
196 ms
btn04.png
173 ms
btn05.png
317 ms
btn06.png
339 ms
campArea_b20160311moc.png
103 ms
campArea_img002_kuma.png
53 ms
campArea_textarea_kuma150702xzr.png
54 ms
search_bottom_text_back.png
55 ms
campArea_btn.png
56 ms
underline.png
38 ms
campArea_textarea_highlight.png
38 ms
click.cm accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
click.cm best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
click.cm SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Click.cm can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Japanese. Our system also found out that Click.cm main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
click.cm
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Click. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: