3.9 sec in total
399 ms
3.3 sec
166 ms
Welcome to cloudifer.net homepage info - get ready to check Cloudifer best content for Italy right away, or after learning these important things about cloudifer.net
Upload, share, track, manage your files in one simple to use file host.
Visit cloudifer.netWe analyzed Cloudifer.net page load time and found that the first response time was 399 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
cloudifer.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value2.9 s
82/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
399 ms
229 ms
26 ms
241 ms
250 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Cloudifer.net, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Cloudifer.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (68%)
1.6 MB
506.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Cloudifer.net main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 851.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 152.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cloudifer needs image optimization as it can save up to 152.9 kB or 45% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 614.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 614.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 234.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cloudifer.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 234.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (76%)
67
16
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cloudifer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cloudifer.net
399 ms
socialsider-v1.0.css
229 ms
css
26 ms
bootstrap.css
241 ms
flexslider.css
250 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
222 ms
style.css
231 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
325 ms
layerslider6e0e.css
429 ms
jquery.js
653 ms
bootstrap68b3.js
643 ms
jquery.easing.1.168b3.js
443 ms
jquery.easing.1.368b3.js
444 ms
jquery.flexslider-min68b3.js
546 ms
themeple68b3.js
634 ms
jquery.pixel68b3.js
769 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.0.6-packed68b3.js
1089 ms
jquery.mobilemenu68b3.js
759 ms
isotope68b3.js
849 ms
greyScale.min68b3.js
868 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min68b3.js
1072 ms
font-awesome.css
983 ms
font-awesome.min.css
997 ms
custom.css
1064 ms
responsive.css
1079 ms
entypo.css
1190 ms
file-upload.css
1216 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
976 ms
jquery-ui.js
1208 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
1200 ms
jquery.tmpl.min.js
1196 ms
load-image.min.js
1201 ms
canvas-to-blob.min.js
1315 ms
jquery.iframe-transport.js
1338 ms
jquery.fileupload.js
1409 ms
jquery.fileupload-process.js
1413 ms
jquery.fileupload-resize.js
1413 ms
jquery.fileupload-validate.js
1429 ms
jquery.fileupload-ui.js
1425 ms
ZeroClipboard.js
1432 ms
global.js
1475 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery6e0e.js
1588 ms
jquery-easing-1.36f3e.js
1506 ms
main_logo_inverted.png
212 ms
menu_item.png
445 ms
delete_small.png
218 ms
add_small.gif
230 ms
red_error_small.png
233 ms
green_tick_small.png
333 ms
blue_right_arrow.png
417 ms
processing_small.gif
424 ms
reja-2.png
544 ms
reja-1.png
538 ms
cloud-top.png
537 ms
cloud-lock.png
628 ms
cloud-left.png
775 ms
cloud-right.png
766 ms
index_responsive_image.jpg
875 ms
bottom_arrow.png
971 ms
2slidershadow.png
750 ms
market.png
823 ms
njerez.png
964 ms
bota.png
963 ms
cod.png
969 ms
box-pikat.png
1031 ms
right_arrow.png
1260 ms
banner_shadow.png
1187 ms
line-divider.png
1188 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
30 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
40 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
49 ms
cloudifer.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
cloudifer.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
cloudifer.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cloudifer.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Cloudifer.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cloudifer.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cloudifer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: