6.3 sec in total
1.6 sec
4.2 sec
604 ms
Click here to check amazing Cloudsfer content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cloudsfer.com
Cloud migration between cloud storage providers: Google drive, Dropbox and more! Sync cloud services, Migrate cloud data.
Visit cloudsfer.comWe analyzed Cloudsfer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
cloudsfer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value21.7 s
0/100
10%
Value18,370 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.221
56/100
15%
Value30.7 s
0/100
10%
1564 ms
45 ms
14 ms
25 ms
21 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Cloudsfer.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Onehourtranslation.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Secure.livechatinc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Cloudsfer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (60%)
1.8 MB
729.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Cloudsfer.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cloudsfer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cloudsfer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (59%)
83
34
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cloudsfer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.cloudsfer.com
1564 ms
bY5BDgIhDEUvJKIrD-ARPAGUjqlTWqRgHE_vOAsNidvX91969KDSAjQ3ac3u5EmAe0LzYOatLYy2O3hg7cnLqgSmF37JR5p7RIcysCCUQxu9271jXfbxaUwJ63BbEcwDyeEqNBG4oqWXf6F87tY0X6Aqcwy_4Pb1sKhoRcXoMWLYAm8.css
45 ms
language-selector.css
14 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.js
21 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
20 ms
jquery.form.min.js
15 ms
scripts.js
15 ms
modern.js
16 ms
wow.min.js
16 ms
jcolumn.js
19 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
275 ms
slick.min.js
276 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
17 ms
ddslick.js
17 ms
smooth.scroll.js
19 ms
jquery.mixitup.js
21 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.js
19 ms
scrollify.min.js
20 ms
scripts.js
21 ms
sitepress.js
25 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
206 ms
analytics.js
199 ms
tracking.js
185 ms
linkedinsm.png
145 ms
spritesheet_optimized.png
37 ms
white_logo_07.png
36 ms
homepage_main_section_bg_01_reduced.png
194 ms
small_cloud.png
36 ms
big_cloud.png
37 ms
HomepageMobile1-reduced.png
41 ms
icon_main.png
37 ms
icons_new_logo.png
38 ms
orange_button_arr.png
39 ms
home_section_bg.jpg
40 ms
clock_icon_03.png
40 ms
locker_icon_05.png
42 ms
cloud_icon_08.png
40 ms
price_section_bg.jpg
41 ms
tabs_section_bg.jpg
42 ms
ti1_03.png
44 ms
ti4_03.png
42 ms
ti2_03.png
193 ms
ti3_03.png
42 ms
Activity-Report.png
42 ms
Migration-Report.png
136 ms
Admin-Tools.png
43 ms
Advanced-Features.png
130 ms
Systems.png
130 ms
footer_logo_03.png
131 ms
footer_logo.png
131 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
124 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
126 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
125 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
82 ms
collect
116 ms
script_data.js
168 ms
west.js
154 ms
collect
54 ms
localization.en.0.3632191afe35222a6b78c04d457adc0d_3d4874eea2c99157a0e90bbf52199229.js
64 ms
ping
79 ms
5.png
30 ms
open_chat.cgi
71 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
74 ms
livechat-modern_7cf45543dc.ttf
51 ms
main.js
85 ms
embedded.20160229163048.js
125 ms
ltr.css
72 ms
l10n-567fda57916247-04285956
282 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
30 ms
FlickrLogoWithText.png
133 ms
FacebookWithText.png
22 ms
PicasaLogoWithText.png
20 ms
GoogleDriveLogoWithText.png
192 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
13 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
67 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
72 ms
plusone.js
67 ms
widgets.js
29 ms
google.png
60 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
152 ms
jot
220 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
154 ms
united_states.png
106 ms
like.php
160 ms
germany.png
79 ms
spain.png
78 ms
edit.png
62 ms
follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
45 ms
jot
29 ms
rU2ubZ6l1Q5.js
290 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
328 ms
cloudsfer.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cloudsfer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
cloudsfer.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cloudsfer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cloudsfer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cloudsfer.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cloudsfer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: