14.8 sec in total
571 ms
13.8 sec
467 ms
Click here to check amazing Codebumble content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about codebumble.net
Codebumble is one of the growing industries of the technology era. Our corporate software development services include next-generation enterprise apps for the web and desktop.
Visit codebumble.netWe analyzed Codebumble.net page load time and found that the first response time was 571 ms and then it took 14.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
codebumble.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value4.7 s
33/100
25%
Value7.9 s
22/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value5.6 s
70/100
10%
571 ms
1067 ms
521 ms
779 ms
1408 ms
Our browser made a total of 180 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (176 requests) were addressed to the original Codebumble.net, 1% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Codebumble.net.
Page size can be reduced by 522.0 kB (11%)
4.8 MB
4.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Codebumble.net main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.1 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 471.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Codebumble images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 100 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codebumble.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (9%)
32
29
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codebumble. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
codebumble.net
571 ms
codebumble.net
1067 ms
fontawesome.css
521 ms
tailwind.css
779 ms
home.css
1408 ms
splide.min.js
16 ms
main.js
1063 ms
home.js
850 ms
code-white.svg
1037 ms
css2
27 ms
blob-1.svg
268 ms
developer.svg
912 ms
secure.svg
266 ms
high-performance.svg
1044 ms
bug-problem.svg
544 ms
dashboard-interface.svg
284 ms
creative-idea.svg
517 ms
processing.svg
531 ms
salesman.svg
569 ms
web-app.svg
767 ms
basket.svg
786 ms
designs.svg
832 ms
employees.svg
851 ms
video-tutorials.svg
1024 ms
saifur.jpg
2366 ms
shakil.png
2230 ms
enan.png
5320 ms
sunny.jpg
2728 ms
yy.jpg
2311 ms
anik.jpg
2577 ms
ahad.jpg
3676 ms
asif.jpg
2570 ms
avatar.svg
2631 ms
code-ind.svg
2829 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmRTM.ttf
20 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshRTM.ttf
25 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.15.4.woff
2764 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.15.3.woff
2823 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.15.1.woff
2915 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.14.0.woff
3016 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.13.0.woff
3023 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.12.1.woff
3087 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.12.0.woff
3294 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.11.2.woff
3302 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.11.1.woff
3294 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.11.0.woff
3353 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.10.2.woff
3551 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.10.1.woff
3559 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.9.0.woff
3375 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.8.2.woff
3425 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.8.0.woff
3596 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.7.1.woff
3371 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.7.0.woff
3357 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.6.3.woff
3423 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.6.1.woff
3384 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.6.0.woff
3364 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.5.0.woff
3351 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.4.1.woff
3317 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.4.0.woff
3363 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.3.0.woff
3357 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.2.0.woff
3365 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.1.1.woff
3354 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.1.0.woff
2178 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.13.woff
2658 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.11.woff
2191 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.10.woff
2076 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.9.woff
2083 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.7.woff
2033 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.5.woff
2117 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.3.woff
2065 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.1.woff
2068 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.0.woff
2016 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.15.4.woff
2145 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.15.3.woff
2036 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.15.1.woff
2043 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.14.0.woff
1990 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.13.0.woff
1844 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.12.1.woff
1999 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.12.0.woff
2038 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.11.2.woff
1954 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.11.1.woff
1769 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.11.0.woff
1840 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.10.2.woff
1961 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.10.1.woff
1952 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.9.0.woff
1949 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.8.2.woff
1774 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.8.0.woff
1827 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.7.1.woff
1837 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.7.0.woff
1936 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.6.3.woff
1916 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.6.1.woff
1769 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.6.0.woff
1773 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.5.0.woff
1853 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.4.1.woff
1781 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.4.0.woff
1869 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.3.0.woff
1778 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.2.0.woff
1752 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.1.1.woff
1764 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.1.0.woff
1701 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.13.woff
1639 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.11.woff
1726 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.10.woff
1735 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.9.woff
1605 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.7.woff
1536 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.5.woff
1614 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.3.woff
1656 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.1.woff
1676 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.0.woff
1537 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.15.4.woff
1552 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.15.3.woff
1586 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.15.1.woff
1628 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.14.0.woff
1657 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.13.0.woff
1588 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.12.1.woff
2021 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.12.0.woff
1571 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.11.2.woff
1619 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.11.1.woff
1629 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.11.0.woff
1685 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.10.2.woff
1550 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.10.1.woff
1581 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.9.0.woff
1655 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.8.2.woff
1652 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.8.0.woff
1730 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.7.1.woff
1669 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.7.0.woff
1570 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.6.3.woff
1683 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.6.1.woff
1658 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.6.0.woff
1731 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.5.0.woff
1663 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.4.1.woff
1719 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.4.0.woff
1577 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.3.0.woff
2146 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.2.0.woff
1693 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.1.1.woff
2208 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.1.0.woff
1655 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.13.woff
2162 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.11.woff
1628 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.10.woff
1735 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.9.woff
1735 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.7.woff
1856 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.5.woff
1904 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.3.woff
1844 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.1.woff
1912 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.0.woff
1927 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.15.4.woff
1951 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.15.3.woff
1945 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.15.1.woff
1920 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.14.0.woff
1847 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.13.0.woff
1920 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.12.1.woff
2932 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.12.0.woff
1885 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.11.2.woff
1883 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.11.1.woff
1841 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.11.0.woff
1815 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.10.2.woff
1877 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.10.1.woff
1862 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.9.0.woff
1883 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.8.2.woff
1838 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.8.0.woff
1868 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.7.1.woff
1908 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.7.0.woff
1956 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.6.3.woff
1878 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.6.1.woff
1894 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.6.0.woff
2398 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.5.0.woff
1931 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.4.1.woff
1934 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.4.0.woff
1948 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.3.0.woff
1858 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.2.0.woff
1937 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.1.1.woff
1890 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.1.0.woff
1791 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.0.13.woff
1811 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.0.11.woff
1814 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.0.10.woff
1866 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.0.9.woff
1778 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.0.7.woff
2227 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.0.5.woff
1808 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.0.3.woff
1878 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.0.1.woff
1823 ms
pro-fa-duotone-900-5.0.0.woff
1830 ms
codebumble.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
codebumble.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
codebumble.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codebumble.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codebumble.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
codebumble.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Codebumble. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: