Tools & Wizards About Us
coldfront.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

coldfront.net

Coldfront

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

679 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

86 ms

coldfront.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Coldfront content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about coldfront.net

Joomla! - the dynamic portal engine and content management system

Visit coldfront.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Coldfront.net page load time and found that the first response time was 679 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

coldfront.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

coldfront.net

679 ms

mootools.js

796 ms

core.css

928 ms

layout.css

698 ms

templatestyle1.css

1702 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Coldfront.net, 14% (2 requests) were made to Partner.googleadservices.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Securepubads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Coldfront.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 139.6 kB (61%)

Content Size

229.5 kB

After Optimization

89.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Coldfront.net main page is 229.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 119.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 8.5 kB
  • After minification 7.9 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 46.2 kB
  • After minification 41.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Coldfront needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 85.1 kB

  • Original 119.2 kB
  • After minification 119.2 kB
  • After compression 34.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 43.5 kB

  • Original 55.6 kB
  • After minification 49.7 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coldfront.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (31%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coldfront. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

coldfront.net

coldfront.net

679 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

796 ms

core.css

core.css

928 ms

layout.css

layout.css

698 ms

templatestyle1.css

templatestyle1.css

1702 ms

google_service.js

google_service.js

123 ms

google_ads.js

google_ads.js

189 ms

header_gradient.jpg

header_gradient.jpg

117 ms

logo.png

logo.png

230 ms

sub_gradient.png

sub_gradient.png

117 ms

ads

ads

533 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

131 ms

gradients.png

gradients.png

116 ms

osd.js

osd.js

192 ms

SEO Factors

coldfront.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coldfront.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Coldfront.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

coldfront.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Coldfront. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: