2.8 sec in total
505 ms
2 sec
309 ms
Welcome to compare.se homepage info - get ready to check Compare best content for Sweden right away, or after learning these important things about compare.se
Compare är ett kluster som samlar de företag, organisationer och individer som tillsammans och långsiktigt vill utveckla Värmland till en attraktiv digital region, med nationell och internationell spe...
Visit compare.seWe analyzed Compare.se page load time and found that the first response time was 505 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
compare.se performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value4.7 s
33/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value840 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.138
79/100
15%
Value16.1 s
6/100
10%
505 ms
26 ms
12 ms
113 ms
219 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Compare.se, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (689 ms) belongs to the original domain Compare.se.
Page size can be reduced by 256.7 kB (37%)
687.0 kB
430.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Compare.se main page is 687.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 320.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 148.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 148.5 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Compare.se needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (70%)
37
11
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
compare.se
505 ms
css
26 ms
font-awesome.css
12 ms
aggregator.css
113 ms
node.css
219 ms
defaults.css
218 ms
system.css
226 ms
system-menus.css
224 ms
user.css
227 ms
content-module.css
230 ms
date.css
324 ms
filefield.css
322 ms
mollom.css
334 ms
fieldgroup.css
335 ms
views.css
337 ms
quicktabs.css
344 ms
screen.css
429 ms
jquery.min.js
38 ms
jquery.min.js
537 ms
drupal.js
468 ms
progress.js
467 ms
sv_f705ddc697f1eb25195fa384593e70cd.js
468 ms
poormanscron.js
469 ms
googleanalytics.js
532 ms
quicktabs.js
556 ms
plugins.js
670 ms
scripts.js
560 ms
analytics.js
117 ms
affarer.jpg
578 ms
logo.png
118 ms
search-btn.png
119 ms
white-transp.png
109 ms
descriptive-icons.png
118 ms
bb-pager.png
119 ms
kompetens.jpg
566 ms
ict-karlstad_0.jpg
689 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
45 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
45 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
51 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
8 ms
collect
29 ms
print.css
113 ms
compare.se accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
compare.se best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
compare.se SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
SV
SV
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Compare.se can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Swedish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Compare.se main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
compare.se
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Compare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: