2.4 sec in total
215 ms
2 sec
201 ms
Welcome to competitorscompanion.com homepage info - get ready to check Competitors Companion best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about competitorscompanion.com
Visit competitorscompanion.comWe analyzed Competitorscompanion.com page load time and found that the first response time was 215 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
competitorscompanion.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
77/100
10%
Value4.5 s
37/100
25%
Value2.8 s
95/100
10%
Value680 ms
44/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value6.1 s
64/100
10%
215 ms
238 ms
84 ms
52 ms
5 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Competitorscompanion.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (543 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 82.4 kB (29%)
288.5 kB
206.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Competitorscompanion.com main page is 288.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 165.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Competitors Companion images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 41.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.8 kB or 25% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Competitorscompanion.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (23%)
43
33
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Competitors Companion. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
competitorscompanion.com
215 ms
www.competitorscompanion.com
238 ms
style.css
84 ms
jquery.min.js
52 ms
adsbygoogle.js
5 ms
analytics.js
63 ms
all.js
269 ms
logo200.gif
130 ms
featured.png
159 ms
facebook.png
161 ms
twitter.png
163 ms
rss.png
162 ms
ours.png
163 ms
arrow.png
164 ms
cars.png
260 ms
holidays.png
260 ms
cash.png
261 ms
low.png
261 ms
other.png
260 ms
slogan.png
261 ms
uk.png
320 ms
us.png
320 ms
can.png
324 ms
aus.png
324 ms
ca-pub-0723436245605355.js
33 ms
zrt_lookup.html
29 ms
show_ads_impl.js
55 ms
collect
25 ms
collect
111 ms
ads
157 ms
osd.js
9 ms
233 ms
xd_arbiter.php
224 ms
xd_arbiter.php
430 ms
5951536323341373104
47 ms
abg.js
50 ms
m_js_controller.js
62 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
59 ms
s
4 ms
x_button_blue2.png
26 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
3 ms
ui
37 ms
like.php
180 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
484 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
543 ms
activeview
14 ms
competitorscompanion.com accessibility score
competitorscompanion.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
competitorscompanion.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Competitorscompanion.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Competitorscompanion.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
competitorscompanion.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Competitors Companion. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: