2.3 sec in total
341 ms
1.6 sec
292 ms
Welcome to conjoon.com homepage info - get ready to check Conjoon best content right away, or after learning these important things about conjoon.com
webmail made easy
Visit conjoon.comWe analyzed Conjoon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 341 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
conjoon.com performance score
341 ms
211 ms
229 ms
187 ms
231 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Conjoon.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (684 ms) belongs to the original domain Conjoon.com.
Page size can be reduced by 354.8 kB (41%)
871.2 kB
516.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Conjoon.com main page is 871.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 461.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Conjoon needs image optimization as it can save up to 70.1 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 201.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 201.1 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Conjoon.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (65%)
52
18
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conjoon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
conjoon.com
341 ms
jquery.js
211 ms
conjoon.com
229 ms
style.css
187 ms
conjoon.com
231 ms
deep_ocean.css
198 ms
conjoon.com
233 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
379 ms
overallmenu.js
294 ms
jquery.cycle.min.js
304 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
327 ms
cufon-yui.js
326 ms
Futura_Bk_BT_400.font.js
425 ms
custom.js
387 ms
reset.css
170 ms
prettyPhoto.css
193 ms
shortcodes.css
196 ms
style.css
249 ms
header_bg.png
129 ms
logo.png
128 ms
banner_bg.png
129 ms
webmailmadeeasy2.png
247 ms
email_account.png
217 ms
folder_management.png
337 ms
reading_emails.png
300 ms
watching_youtube.png
412 ms
banner_button.png
233 ms
headlines_bg.png
309 ms
started.png
325 ms
bullhorn.png
339 ms
intro_top_bg.png
394 ms
intro_image.png
400 ms
widget_image.png
424 ms
screenshot1_small.jpg
526 ms
screenshot43.jpg
525 ms
wizard-1.jpg
581 ms
footer_widget_bg.png
499 ms
arrow.gif
500 ms
footer_widget_line.png
513 ms
footer_started.png
594 ms
footer_home.png
593 ms
footer_email.png
606 ms
footer_support.png
617 ms
footer_copyright_bg.png
616 ms
twitter.png
673 ms
facebook.png
684 ms
ga.js
46 ms
fade_loader.gif
569 ms
banner_button_active.png
581 ms
sprite.png
593 ms
loader.gif
594 ms
up.png
652 ms
__utm.gif
18 ms
conjoon.com SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conjoon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Conjoon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
conjoon.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Conjoon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: