Tools & Wizards About Us
contentwatch.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

contentwatch.com

Internet Filtering Software - Award-Winning Internet Filtering for Organizations | ContentWatch

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

10 ms

Resources Loaded

931 ms

Page Rendered

89 ms

contentwatch.com screenshot

About Website

Visit contentwatch.com now to see the best up-to-date Content Watch content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about contentwatch.com

The world's best internet filtering- ready to help your business.

Visit contentwatch.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Contentwatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 10 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

contentwatch.com performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

54/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

70/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

contentwatch.com

10 ms

www.contentwatch.com

330 ms

gtm.js

148 ms

api.js

124 ms

script.js

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Contentwatch.com, 68% (15 requests) were made to Cdn-prod.contentwatch.net and 5% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (413 ms) relates to the external source Safetonet.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 16.1 kB (5%)

Content Size

327.3 kB

After Optimization

311.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Contentwatch.com main page is 327.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 270.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 13.1 kB
  • After minification 13.0 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 13.9 kB
  • After minification 11.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Content Watch needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 270.8 kB
  • After minification 270.7 kB
  • After compression 268.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 29.5 kB
  • After minification 29.5 kB
  • After compression 27.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentwatch.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (65%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Watch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

contentwatch.com

contentwatch.com

10 ms

www.contentwatch.com

www.contentwatch.com

330 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

148 ms

api.js

api.js

124 ms

script.js

script.js

60 ms

modernizr-2.0.6.min.js

modernizr-2.0.6.min.js

62 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

82 ms

layout.css

layout.css

92 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

90 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

91 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

jquery.tools.min.js

112 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

113 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

115 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

124 ms

base.js

base.js

122 ms

cwi.popups.js

cwi.popups.js

122 ms

cwi.fancybox.js

cwi.fancybox.js

126 ms

cwi.events.js

cwi.events.js

122 ms

stn-logo-wh-retina-157x52.png

stn-logo-wh-retina-157x52.png

413 ms

content-watch-logo.png

content-watch-logo.png

66 ms

footer-content-bgnoshadow.png

footer-content-bgnoshadow.png

54 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

31 ms

Accessibility Review

contentwatch.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

contentwatch.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

contentwatch.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentwatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentwatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

contentwatch.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Content Watch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: