4.2 sec in total
410 ms
3.2 sec
645 ms
Click here to check amazing Content Writing Square content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about contentwritingsquare.com
Looking for the best content writing services? Feel free to contact Content Writing squareor visit our website for more details.
Visit contentwritingsquare.comWe analyzed Contentwritingsquare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 410 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
contentwritingsquare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value530 ms
56/100
30%
Value1.527
0/100
15%
Value12.4 s
14/100
10%
410 ms
152 ms
270 ms
313 ms
158 ms
Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Contentwritingsquare.com, 12% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Contentwritingsquare.com.
Page size can be reduced by 202.8 kB (12%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Contentwritingsquare.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 142.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 41.5 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 557 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Content Writing Square images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 53.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentwritingsquare.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (68%)
96
31
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Writing Square. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
contentwritingsquare.com
410 ms
bootstrap.min.css
152 ms
animate.css
270 ms
fontawesome-all.css
313 ms
themify-icons.css
158 ms
lightgallery.css
159 ms
audioplayer.css
285 ms
magnific-popup.css
311 ms
owl.carousel.css
310 ms
slit-slider.css
334 ms
slick.css
419 ms
base.css
432 ms
shortcodes.css
460 ms
default-theme.css
457 ms
responsive.css
536 ms
contentwritingsquare.com
523 ms
color-customizer.css
562 ms
js
57 ms
email-decode.min.js
312 ms
jquery.min.js
29 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
sidebar.css
432 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
30 ms
sideone.js
486 ms
sidetwo.js
337 ms
jquery.3.3.1.min.js
493 ms
popper.min.js
615 ms
bootstrap.min.js
744 ms
jquery.appear.js
615 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
615 ms
modernizr.js
669 ms
jquery.smartmenus.js
668 ms
lightgallery.js
857 ms
audioplayer.js
857 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
857 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
890 ms
jquery.ba-cond.min.js
892 ms
jquery.slitslider.js
896 ms
slick.js
1014 ms
jarallax.min.js
895 ms
counter.js
915 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
956 ms
js
55 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
956 ms
contact-form.js
953 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
951 ms
map.js
935 ms
typer.js
977 ms
color-customizer.js
982 ms
theme-script.js
1107 ms
css
29 ms
css
42 ms
css
47 ms
css
46 ms
default
295 ms
cp-logo-web.png
787 ms
phone.png
824 ms
14.jpg
1039 ms
user3.png
795 ms
02.png
797 ms
user1.png
921 ms
user2.png
1040 ms
01.png
1039 ms
js
88 ms
analytics.js
85 ms
l1.png
987 ms
l2.png
931 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
178 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
226 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff
368 ms
wXK2E2wfpokopxzthSqPbcR5_gVaxazCiaps.woff
400 ms
CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlC6OA6T_N9.woff
467 ms
CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCzOE6T_N9.woff
429 ms
CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlC0OI6T_N9.woff
402 ms
CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCtOM6T_N9.woff
428 ms
CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCmOQ6T_N9.woff
427 ms
CSR94z5ZnPydRjlCCwlKa8cp.woff
408 ms
CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCwOU6T_N9.woff
404 ms
Flaticon.svg
1320 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-s.woff
405 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfr.woff
404 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfr.woff
405 ms
Flaticon.woff
1083 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1122 ms
collect
90 ms
collect
88 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
902 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1000 ms
themify9f249f24.woff
1008 ms
l3.png
925 ms
l4.png
1045 ms
l5.png
891 ms
l6.png
880 ms
web-banner4.jpg
832 ms
05.jpg
1012 ms
06.jpg
935 ms
07.jpg
1029 ms
cp-logo-web.html
997 ms
cross.png
991 ms
02.jpg
1323 ms
17.jpg
1015 ms
03.jpg
1177 ms
01.jpg
385 ms
map.png
618 ms
ajax-loader.html
561 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
164 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
173 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
187 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
177 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
171 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
199 ms
twk-main.js
208 ms
twk-vendor.js
292 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
369 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
416 ms
twk-runtime.js
236 ms
twk-app.js
252 ms
contentwritingsquare.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
contentwritingsquare.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
contentwritingsquare.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentwritingsquare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentwritingsquare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
contentwritingsquare.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Content Writing Square. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: