3.3 sec in total
489 ms
2.7 sec
205 ms
Click here to check amazing Coremain content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about coremain.com
Coremain lo forman profesionales que ofrecen servicios de consultoría, diseño, desarrollo y soluciones del software y en el outsourcing de proyectos TI.
Visit coremain.comWe analyzed Coremain.com page load time and found that the first response time was 489 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
coremain.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value55.2 s
0/100
25%
Value13.8 s
1/100
10%
Value1,770 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value13.4 s
11/100
10%
489 ms
89 ms
176 ms
177 ms
178 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Coremain.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (785 ms) belongs to the original domain Coremain.com.
Page size can be reduced by 506.0 kB (65%)
773.2 kB
267.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Coremain.com main page is 773.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 412.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Coremain images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 283.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 283.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 188.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coremain.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 188.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (67%)
63
21
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coremain. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
489 ms
modal.css
89 ms
system.css
176 ms
general.css
177 ms
style.css
178 ms
style.css
179 ms
animate.css
179 ms
mod_jaslideshowlite-fade.css
180 ms
template.css
261 ms
addons.css
263 ms
template.css
263 ms
layout.css
267 ms
usertools.css
273 ms
css3.css
274 ms
mega.css
349 ms
k2.css
354 ms
typo.css
352 ms
template.css
363 ms
layout.css
367 ms
mega.css
369 ms
mod_jasidenews.css
434 ms
mod_jaslideshowlite.css
436 ms
mootools-core.js
610 ms
core.js
439 ms
modal.js
445 ms
jquery.min.js
29 ms
k2.noconflict.js
448 ms
k2.js
520 ms
mootools-more.js
785 ms
caption.js
526 ms
core.js
532 ms
mega.js
535 ms
script.js
605 ms
script.js
611 ms
EUCookieDirective.js
617 ms
system.css
456 ms
ga.js
18 ms
logo.png
89 ms
es.gif
90 ms
en.gif
93 ms
gl.gif
90 ms
icon-search.png
91 ms
mainnav-active-bg.gif
92 ms
arrow3.png
175 ms
imagen2_960_225.jpg
271 ms
Tecnopole_140_100.jpg
176 ms
Expansi%C3%B3n_140_100.jpg
176 ms
Innterconecta_140_100.jpg
177 ms
Reino_Unido_web_140_100.jpg
178 ms
facebook_32.png
270 ms
twitter_32.png
272 ms
linkedin_32.png
270 ms
arrow.png
274 ms
mask-left.png
268 ms
mask-right.png
340 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
bullet-dark.gif
314 ms
icon-phone.png
315 ms
icon-email.png
315 ms
continue_button.png
314 ms
slideloading.gif
298 ms
layout-mobile.css
90 ms
layout-mobile-port.css
88 ms
layout-tablet.css
90 ms
coremain.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
coremain.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
coremain.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ES
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coremain.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Coremain.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
coremain.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Coremain. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: