1.4 sec in total
18 ms
479 ms
877 ms
Welcome to coretalk.com homepage info - get ready to check Coretalk best content right away, or after learning these important things about coretalk.com
Visit coretalk.comWe analyzed Coretalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
coretalk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value5.2 s
24/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value8,200 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.041
99/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
18 ms
42 ms
33 ms
10 ms
17 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Coretalk.com, 95% (37 requests) were made to Lkqheavytruck.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (197 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.
Page size can be reduced by 209.7 kB (39%)
534.3 kB
324.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Coretalk.com main page is 534.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 176.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 129.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.2 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Coretalk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.0 kB or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coretalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.8 kB or 52% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (82%)
34
6
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coretalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
coretalk.com
18 ms
lkqheavytruck.com
42 ms
lkqheavytruck.com
33 ms
style.min.css
10 ms
autoptimize_single_20e8490fab0dcf7557a5c8b54494db6f.css
17 ms
autoptimize_single_359aca8a88b2331aa34ac505acad9911.css
25 ms
autoptimize_single_e6fa0ab1e511473032e374f0ec4fc1ec.css
46 ms
autoptimize_single_9d3a8da04c850b34890ba5d5f0452d03.css
18 ms
autoptimize_single_70114d8ee1c6613e83f0b1ca9f596ad2.css
19 ms
autoptimize_single_b7df7431991ec795c26224e66ad33d55.css
18 ms
styles.min.css
20 ms
autoptimize_single_4edf7049fab402d4341ce270cfcf7268.css
30 ms
style.css
28 ms
jquery.min.js
21 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
21 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
24 ms
Popup.js
74 ms
PopupConfig.js
25 ms
PopupBuilder.js
28 ms
AnalyticsApi.js
65 ms
Analytics.js
66 ms
AdvancedClosing.js
67 ms
lazysizes.min.js
66 ms
cs.6f62d0f.js
156 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
66 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
158 ms
index.js
66 ms
SubscriptionPlusForm.js
67 ms
Validate.js
68 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
68 ms
x.js
67 ms
flexslider.js
149 ms
gtm.js
197 ms
searchbar_bg3.jpg
122 ms
lkq_ht_logo.png
123 ms
LKQ_LogoHeavyTruck_vertical_R_ElectricBlue_RGB-Copy-Copy.png
39 ms
CoolingSystems_WebBanner_HeavyTruck3.png
42 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
26 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
27 ms
coretalk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
coretalk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
coretalk.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coretalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Coretalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
coretalk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Coretalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: