4.5 sec in total
315 ms
3.9 sec
335 ms
Visit cospace.in now to see the best up-to-date Cospace content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cospace.in
CoSpace
Visit cospace.inWe analyzed Cospace.in page load time and found that the first response time was 315 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
cospace.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value3.0 s
79/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value3.3 s
93/100
10%
315 ms
160 ms
168 ms
171 ms
340 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (103 requests) were addressed to the original Cospace.in, 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Cospace.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (27%)
3.8 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Cospace.in main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 36.8 kB, which is 49% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.3 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 296.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cospace images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 447.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 447.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 217.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cospace.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 217.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (46%)
97
52
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cospace. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cospace.in
315 ms
css3.css
160 ms
addons.css
168 ms
layout.css
171 ms
theme.css
340 ms
menu.css
166 ms
colorbox.css
178 ms
widgets.css
612 ms
off-canvas.css
621 ms
font-awesome.css
701 ms
font-awesome-ie7.css
764 ms
jmproduct.css
628 ms
style.css
653 ms
jm.slideshow.css
697 ms
jmmegamenu.css
770 ms
jm.tabs.css
690 ms
style.css
715 ms
prototype.js
1093 ms
ccard.js
804 ms
validation.js
896 ms
builder.js
842 ms
effects.js
915 ms
dragdrop.js
920 ms
controls.js
961 ms
slider.js
926 ms
js.js
1017 ms
form.js
1008 ms
menu.js
1019 ms
translate.js
987 ms
cookies.js
1023 ms
jquery.js
1243 ms
jmbasetheme.js
1069 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.easing.js
1090 ms
ja.accordion.nav.js
1085 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
1146 ms
jquery.accordion.js
1061 ms
ja.script.js
1113 ms
jquery.equalheights.js
1106 ms
lemmon-slider.js
1103 ms
jquery.noconflict.js
1189 ms
off-canvas.js
1102 ms
stylesheet.css
1009 ms
jm.slideshow.js
779 ms
jcarousellite_1.0.1_custom.js
735 ms
body-bg.jpg
633 ms
pattern.png
153 ms
Cospace-Logo1.jpg
203 ms
topbanner3.jpg
221 ms
kids5_940_459.jpg
762 ms
fashionShow2_940_459.jpg
585 ms
Xmas-3_940_459.jpg
1003 ms
bedcover4_940_459.jpg
1032 ms
build-1_940_459.jpg
923 ms
kids5_180_100.jpg
779 ms
fashionShow2_180_100.jpg
912 ms
Xmas-2_180_100.jpg
938 ms
bedcover4_180_100.jpg
994 ms
build-1_180_100.jpg
1047 ms
re-left.gif
1050 ms
re-right.gif
1048 ms
saree.png
1251 ms
17_1.jpg
1197 ms
xmas-item.jpg
1216 ms
frock.jpg
1465 ms
dupattas.jpg
1173 ms
frock1.jpg
1237 ms
saree.jpg
1539 ms
bedcover.jpg
1558 ms
bedcover-rep.jpg
1312 ms
xmasD.jpg
1323 ms
KidsWear.jpg
1340 ms
saree.jpg
1402 ms
angel.jpg
1422 ms
reshmy.jpg
1431 ms
tanmaya.jpg
1505 ms
signature.jpg
1518 ms
kunju.png
1524 ms
jann.png
1563 ms
namitha.png
1570 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGPgXsetDviZcdR5OzC1KPcw.ttf
9 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGBA_awHl7mXRjE_LQVochcU.ttf
33 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGOiMeWyi5E_-XkTgB5psiDg.ttf
33 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNRl0pGnog23EMYRrBmUzJQ.ttf
32 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGFP7R5lD_au4SZC6Ks_vyWs.ttf
23 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGKXvKVW_haheDNrHjziJZVk.ttf
33 ms
sixyards.png
1550 ms
angel.png
1449 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1401 ms
blank.png
1402 ms
light-title.gif
1044 ms
product_rating_blank_star.gif
1060 ms
product_rating_full_star.gif
930 ms
light-title.gif
885 ms
pre.png
783 ms
next.png
806 ms
icon_mobile.png
762 ms
icon_mail.png
733 ms
icon_social.png
807 ms
icon_facebook.gif
734 ms
icon_google.gif
721 ms
icon_twitter.gif
718 ms
icon_vimeo.gif
743 ms
icon_linkedin.gif
630 ms
checkout-partner.png
629 ms
print.css
81 ms
layout-mobile.css
83 ms
layout-mobile-portrait.css
70 ms
layout-tablet.css
113 ms
layout-normal.css
85 ms
cospace.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
cospace.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
cospace.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cospace.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Cospace.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cospace.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cospace. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: