1.1 sec in total
91 ms
968 ms
71 ms
Visit cqd.net now to see the best up-to-date CQD content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cqd.net
Close Quarters Defense (CQD) Homepage - Full Circle Readiness - Law Enforcement Training - Use of Force Training - Active Threat/Shooter - Security - Military - Executive - High-Performance Team Build...
Visit cqd.netWe analyzed Cqd.net page load time and found that the first response time was 91 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
cqd.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
71/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value1,210 ms
20/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.7 s
13/100
10%
91 ms
58 ms
58 ms
58 ms
144 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cqd.net, 38% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 31% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (473 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 571.6 kB (59%)
969.8 kB
398.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Cqd.net main page is 969.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 708.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 564.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 564.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, CQD needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (45%)
22
12
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CQD. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.cqd.net
91 ms
minified.js
58 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
58 ms
polyfill.min.js
58 ms
thunderbolt-commons.813797e7.bundle.min.js
144 ms
main.6c492079.bundle.min.js
157 ms
lodash.min.js
174 ms
react.production.min.js
156 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
156 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
173 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
172 ms
CQD-Original-logo_edited.png
274 ms
bundle.min.js
78 ms
0baf57_01a334b26ac74886b762cf816020bb38~mv2.jpg
473 ms
0baf57_422d55d221c645268651ae480c111ffb~mv2.png
416 ms
0baf57_9b2ebf0cfbd14c68bb6d7189fa4594f7~mv2.jpg
437 ms
0baf57_2dcaa44ae88141209f4074f47b90e931~mv2.jpeg
411 ms
0baf57_894b94d829c04ea794704752df8a987e~mv2.jpg
402 ms
0baf57_4f429a9eb01a4169acd543c862c859b1~mv2.jpg
421 ms
177 ms
174 ms
171 ms
171 ms
176 ms
161 ms
212 ms
211 ms
205 ms
205 ms
203 ms
209 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
6 ms
61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff
20 ms
file.woff
293 ms
9362bca5-b362-4543-a051-2129e2def911.woff
19 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
9 ms
bolt-performance
26 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
7 ms
right-arrow.svg
9 ms
cqd.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
cqd.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
cqd.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cqd.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cqd.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cqd.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CQD. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: