4.6 sec in total
337 ms
3.6 sec
641 ms
Visit criterion.com.co now to see the best up-to-date Criterion content for Colombia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about criterion.com.co
Visit criterion.com.coWe analyzed Criterion.com.co page load time and found that the first response time was 337 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
criterion.com.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value2.5 s
89/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.048
99/100
15%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
337 ms
132 ms
272 ms
239 ms
134 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Criterion.com.co, 19% (18 requests) were made to Scontent.cdninstagram.com and 9% (8 requests) were made to Instaembedder.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Criterion.com.co.
Page size can be reduced by 319.4 kB (12%)
2.6 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Criterion.com.co main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.1 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Criterion images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 125.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Criterion.com.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 60.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (19%)
93
75
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Criterion. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
criterion.com.co
337 ms
site_global.css
132 ms
index.css
272 ms
museutils.js
239 ms
whatinput.js
134 ms
jquery.watch.js
136 ms
jquery.musepolyfill.bgsize.js
162 ms
webpro.js
294 ms
musewpslideshow.js
335 ms
jquery.museoverlay.js
284 ms
touchswipe.js
293 ms
gallery.php
209 ms
gallery.php
242 ms
furley_bg.jpg
203 ms
facebook.png
136 ms
instagram.png
224 ms
twitter.png
228 ms
pasted-svg-320361x50.svg
301 ms
pasted-svg-1490x122.svg
267 ms
pasted-svg-311465x309.svg
272 ms
pasted-svg-242016x59.svg
570 ms
pasted-svg-127559x127.svg
335 ms
el-gobernador.png
390 ms
pasted-svg-329873x92.svg
397 ms
pasted-svg-94791x48.svg
467 ms
hermanos-rausch-master-chef.png
432 ms
master-chef-junior.png
466 ms
campana-social-pez-leon.png
489 ms
criterion-portal-covers.jpg
527 ms
bistronomy-portal-covers-2.jpg
565 ms
bistronomy-portal-covers-3.jpg
595 ms
rausch-1.jpg
660 ms
rausch.jpg
619 ms
u18272.png
788 ms
marea.jpg
695 ms
kitchen.jpg
1025 ms
kitchen-portal-cover.jpg
725 ms
catering.jpg
749 ms
planta.jpg
790 ms
extra.jpg
830 ms
criterion-book-2015-6.png
929 ms
u12881.png
1075 ms
u12889.png
991 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
14 ms
u12893.png
953 ms
u12887.png
1133 ms
rausch%20yo%20tambien%20quiero%20ser%20chef%20cover.jpg
1049 ms
pasted-svg-170079x170.svg
1031 ms
pasted-svg-170079x1702.svg
1026 ms
pasted-svg-170093x170.svg
1032 ms
u9942-4.png
1020 ms
jquery.min.js
142 ms
jquery.min.js
36 ms
instagram-logo-005.png
1056 ms
u9945-4.png
1041 ms
blank.gif
1042 ms
arrow-right-u18322-3-fr.png
1032 ms
arrow-left-u18325-3-fr.png
1031 ms
50-2014.png
1048 ms
50-2013.png
1057 ms
1515371_1539289353037552_1255245442_n.jpg
166 ms
google-icon.png
53 ms
twitter-icon.png
46 ms
facebook-icon.png
87 ms
like-gray.png
89 ms
play.png
90 ms
1169220_1070990126286251_1746073_n.jpg
181 ms
12797719_1995005654058091_863178533_n.jpg
218 ms
10507823_1542715146027641_1410925048_n.jpg
257 ms
12424647_587037934783217_1339959609_n.jpg
255 ms
10311196_1019955541396599_1674163780_n.jpg
260 ms
12797808_1005891672816334_300749389_n.jpg
258 ms
12798077_240718692936526_1628932819_n.jpg
263 ms
12798193_177476862633779_1989845491_n.jpg
265 ms
1170081_204525419913313_1371961219_n.jpg
293 ms
12783221_2005129636379766_807361997_n.jpg
295 ms
10611128_1516780335296695_1062837410_n.jpg
294 ms
12826168_149167955473660_1877510346_n.jpg
295 ms
924311_1993613550864266_998784430_n.jpg
302 ms
1662763_942765162458882_1022901015_n.jpg
303 ms
12728644_760572457410478_597189211_n.jpg
333 ms
12725094_754061578028755_2012947840_n.jpg
330 ms
12729622_582303415258041_1454455206_n.jpg
334 ms
50.png
1005 ms
u18272-r.png
1066 ms
u12881-r.png
1206 ms
u12889-r.png
1075 ms
u12893-r.png
1123 ms
u12887-r.png
1241 ms
arrow-right-u18322-3-r-fr.png
1068 ms
arrow-left-u18325-3-r-fr.png
1110 ms
hr-slideshow-1g.jpg
1484 ms
loading.gif
1174 ms
hr-slideshow2.jpg
1070 ms
criterion.com.co accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
criterion.com.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
criterion.com.co SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ES
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Criterion.com.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Criterion.com.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
criterion.com.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Criterion. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: