3.7 sec in total
110 ms
2 sec
1.6 sec
Click here to check amazing CT Wedding Group content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ctweddinggroup.com
Create unforgettable moments with the best wedding experience in Connecticut. Contact our wedding planners today to see how we can help.
Visit ctweddinggroup.comWe analyzed Ctweddinggroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 110 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ctweddinggroup.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value18.7 s
0/100
10%
Value12,270 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.073
96/100
15%
Value32.0 s
0/100
10%
110 ms
144 ms
50 ms
95 ms
140 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Ctweddinggroup.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (665 ms) belongs to the original domain Ctweddinggroup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 468.7 kB (3%)
14.2 MB
13.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Ctweddinggroup.com main page is 14.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 14.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 376.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CT Wedding Group images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 119 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (56%)
94
41
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CT Wedding Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ctweddinggroup.com
110 ms
www.ctweddinggroup.com
144 ms
bootstrap.min.css
50 ms
all.min.css
95 ms
v4-shims.min.css
140 ms
js
226 ms
style.min.css
92 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
135 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
204 ms
pronto_magnific_popup.css
203 ms
flexslider.css
206 ms
style.css
208 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
225 ms
jquery.min.js
207 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
224 ms
frontend.js
257 ms
main.css
221 ms
style.css
222 ms
www.ctweddinggroup.com
665 ms
blueimp-gallery.min.css
319 ms
email-decode.min.js
316 ms
formreset.min.css
328 ms
formsmain.min.css
319 ms
readyclass.min.css
319 ms
browsers.min.css
320 ms
sharing.js
319 ms
pronto_jquery_magnific_popup.js
321 ms
pronto_jquery_initialize.js
320 ms
jquery.flexnav.js
321 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
322 ms
lip.js
323 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
324 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
327 ms
dom-ready.min.js
325 ms
hooks.min.js
328 ms
i18n.min.js
326 ms
a11y.min.js
347 ms
jquery.json.min.js
340 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
189 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
241 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
302 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
305 ms
gravityforms.min.js
331 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
267 ms
akismet-frontend.js
234 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
223 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
161 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
153 ms
scrollTo.js
155 ms
scrolltopcontrol.js
157 ms
lazyload.min.js
153 ms
bootstrap.min.js
145 ms
main.js
143 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
linkid.js
50 ms
collect
25 ms
collect
47 ms
css
56 ms
img-logo-r2.png
165 ms
ct-wedding-group-logo.png
129 ms
banner_menu-arrow.png
131 ms
bg-banner-r1-01-1.jpg
139 ms
bg-banner-r1-02-1.jpg
130 ms
sc3_bg-r1.jpg
124 ms
sc4_bg-r1.jpg
122 ms
sc5_bg-r1.jpg
125 ms
img-4thvenue-bg.jpg
496 ms
sc6_logo_crystal-lake-r1.png
123 ms
logo-img-barns.png
126 ms
sc6_logo_lymans.png
131 ms
sc7_img09-1.jpg
134 ms
img-logo-hall-of-fame.jpg
133 ms
img-logo-best-weddings-2019.jpg
140 ms
img-logo-weddingwire-2019.jpg
132 ms
img-logo-lca-catle.jpg
139 ms
3752279095-350x314.jpg
141 ms
img-logo-lgbtq.jpg
140 ms
img-logo-wedding-reports.jpg
140 ms
img-logo-lca-caterers.jpg
141 ms
img-logo-crystal-lake.jpg
141 ms
img-logo-barns.jpg
142 ms
ic-instagram-min.svg
144 ms
form-go.png
223 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
89 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
90 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
265 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfr.woff
268 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-s.woff
267 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfr.woff
269 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
85 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
87 ms
fa-light-300.woff
56 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
85 ms
ga.js
41 ms
sc7_arrow_left.png
10 ms
sc7_arrow_right.png
207 ms
flexslider-icon.woff
12 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
sc7_img03-r1-1.jpg
24 ms
bg-banner-r1-08.jpg
73 ms
bg-banner-r1-09.jpg
76 ms
bg-banner-r1-03-1.jpg
71 ms
bg-banner-r1-04-1.jpg
73 ms
bg-banner-r1-05-1.jpg
42 ms
bg-banner-r1-06-1.jpg
191 ms
sc7_img06-r1-1.jpg
61 ms
sc7_img04-r1-1.jpg
78 ms
ctweddinggroup.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
ctweddinggroup.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ctweddinggroup.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ctweddinggroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ctweddinggroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ctweddinggroup.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CT Wedding Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: