2.4 sec in total
201 ms
1.7 sec
517 ms
Visit decisions.com now to see the best up-to-date Decisions content for South Africa and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about decisions.com
Build software that moves beyond rules engines and workflow management to improve and accelerate any business process. No code required.
Visit decisions.comWe analyzed Decisions.com page load time and found that the first response time was 201 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
decisions.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value360 ms
72/100
30%
Value0.04
99/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
201 ms
24 ms
21 ms
81 ms
167 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Decisions.com, 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (661 ms) belongs to the original domain Decisions.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (54%)
2.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Decisions.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 385.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Decisions needs image optimization as it can save up to 385.0 kB or 40% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 688.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 688.9 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 205.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Decisions.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 205.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (42%)
88
51
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Decisions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
decisions.com
201 ms
css
24 ms
font-awesome.min.css
21 ms
editor-style-shared.css
81 ms
reset.css
167 ms
bootstrap.min.css
241 ms
master5.css
161 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
168 ms
new2.css
166 ms
sections.css
168 ms
products.css
238 ms
new5.css
248 ms
hubspot.css
248 ms
colorbox.min.css
248 ms
jquery.js
330 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
313 ms
svg-inline-min.js
318 ms
jquery-ui-1.9.0.custom.min.js
474 ms
bootstrap.min.js
321 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.0-packed.js
402 ms
jquery.formLabels1.0.js
390 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
398 ms
jquery.validationEngine-en.js
398 ms
jquery.sticky.js
408 ms
functions.js
469 ms
v2.js
79 ms
jquery.cookie.js
545 ms
new_homepage.css
552 ms
E-v1.js
41 ms
jquery.colorbox.1.5.9-min.js
552 ms
helper.min.js
552 ms
wp-embed.min.js
561 ms
conversion.js
15 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
549 ms
ga.js
7 ms
__utm.gif
48 ms
prum.min.js
20 ms
logo.png
118 ms
992.png
306 ms
731.png
238 ms
331.png
173 ms
1061.png
169 ms
91.png
118 ms
231.png
303 ms
841.png
170 ms
691.png
517 ms
461.png
304 ms
931.png
304 ms
251.png
530 ms
66-inv1.png
529 ms
58-inv1.png
537 ms
101-inv1.png
518 ms
7-inv1.png
518 ms
79-inv1.png
529 ms
10-inv1.png
527 ms
83-inv1.png
528 ms
72-inv1.png
628 ms
logo_footer1.png
625 ms
side-screenshots.png
629 ms
side-ebooks.png
623 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
10 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
12 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
87 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
86 ms
banner_decisions_2.jpg
661 ms
iframe_shim
41 ms
z830g6jts3.json
15 ms
em405yunv2.json
73 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
68 ms
boeCNmOCCh-EWFLSfVffDg.woff
69 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
69 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
70 ms
BVtM30trf7q_jfqYeHfjtA.woff
71 ms
190924.js
216 ms
225 ms
992.png
279 ms
731.png
280 ms
331.png
202 ms
1061.png
203 ms
91.png
204 ms
231.png
281 ms
841.png
282 ms
691.png
286 ms
461.png
289 ms
931.png
433 ms
251.png
356 ms
66-inv1.png
359 ms
58-inv1.png
360 ms
101-inv1.png
366 ms
7-inv1.png
368 ms
79-inv1.png
434 ms
10-inv1.png
438 ms
83-inv1.png
442 ms
72-inv1.png
447 ms
22924f8d-7706-4670-b685-e9a4e9093500
56 ms
51 ms
__ptq.gif
13 ms
__ptq.gif
4 ms
beacon.gif
223 ms
decisions.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
decisions.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
decisions.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Decisions.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Decisions.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
decisions.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Decisions. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: