4.7 sec in total
35 ms
4.5 sec
118 ms
Click here to check amazing Dentaltease content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dentaltease.com
Visit dentaltease.comWe analyzed Dentaltease.com page load time and found that the first response time was 35 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
dentaltease.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value430 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.009
100/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
35 ms
1297 ms
160 ms
213 ms
215 ms
Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Dentaltease.com, 96% (109 requests) were made to Andyrdhreviews.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Andyrdhreviews.com.
Page size can be reduced by 163.6 kB (73%)
222.7 kB
59.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Dentaltease.com main page is 222.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 154.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 128.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dentaltease images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 26 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 35.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dentaltease.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 85 (89%)
96
11
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dentaltease. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dentaltease.com
35 ms
andyrdhreviews.com
1297 ms
dashicons.min.css
160 ms
admin-bar.min.css
213 ms
icons-map.min.css
215 ms
bb-icons.min.css
236 ms
buddypress.min.css
335 ms
style.min.css
362 ms
admin-bar.min.css
256 ms
learndash_quiz_front.min.css
283 ms
learndash.min.css
366 ms
ld3.css
626 ms
style.css
364 ms
note.css
364 ms
global.css
411 ms
bundle.min.css
419 ms
bundle.min.css
425 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
427 ms
woocommerce.css
434 ms
jquery.dropdown.min.css
489 ms
learndash_lesson_video.min.css
502 ms
fonts.css
506 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
498 ms
select2.min.css
506 ms
theme.min.css
575 ms
buddypress.min.css
720 ms
learndash.min.css
679 ms
woocommerce.min.css
603 ms
elementor.min.css
591 ms
custom.css
653 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
664 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
689 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
936 ms
hooks.min.js
756 ms
w.js
13 ms
twemoji.min.js
755 ms
bb-emoji-loader.min.js
760 ms
jquery.min.js
770 ms
font-awesome.min.css
117 ms
star-rating.min.css
786 ms
theme.min.css
662 ms
ratings.css
607 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
638 ms
widget-members.min.js
628 ms
jquery-query.min.js
615 ms
jquery-cookie.min.js
607 ms
jquery-scroll-to.min.js
540 ms
front.js
569 ms
bundle.min.js
613 ms
bundle.min.js
607 ms
custom.js
613 ms
hoverintent-js.min.js
721 ms
admin-bar.min.js
714 ms
underscore.min.js
707 ms
wp-util.min.js
703 ms
i18n.min.js
696 ms
buddypress-nouveau.min.js
644 ms
jquery.guillotine.min.js
633 ms
comment-reply.min.js
630 ms
heartbeat.min.js
630 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
628 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
552 ms
js.cookie.min.js
535 ms
woocommerce.min.js
567 ms
learndash_pager.min.js
554 ms
learndash_template_script.min.js
536 ms
jquery.dropdown.min.js
526 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
505 ms
masonry.min.js
504 ms
menu.js
489 ms
fitvids.js
496 ms
slick.min.js
513 ms
panelslider.min.js
506 ms
sticky-kit.js
503 ms
jssocials.min.js
484 ms
main.js
510 ms
validate.min.js
514 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
503 ms
select2.full.min.js
574 ms
progressbar.min.js
495 ms
mousewheel.min.js
474 ms
learndash.min.js
502 ms
learndash-sidebar.min.js
471 ms
g.gif
176 ms
bb-woocommerce.min.js
456 ms
learndash.js
465 ms
star-rating.min.js
416 ms
theme.min.js
341 ms
ratings.js
344 ms
adminbar-background.png
439 ms
logo_final.png
464 ms
search.svg
439 ms
f3bef8827825649998690201d2865430-0-624x468.png
478 ms
5f6304997c121-bpthumb-150x150.png
439 ms
fllaws-624x326.jpg
439 ms
prom-624x326.jpg
461 ms
LAa-1-624x326.jpg
472 ms
SFUIText-Regular.woff
564 ms
SFUIText-Medium.woff
625 ms
SFUIText-Light.woff
537 ms
wARDj0u
20 ms
SFUIText-Semibold.woff
959 ms
SFUIDisplay-Regular.woff
603 ms
SFUIDisplay-Medium.woff
595 ms
SFUIDisplay-Bold.woff
594 ms
SFUIText-RegularItalic.woff
589 ms
SFUIText-LightItalic.woff
739 ms
lined.woff
607 ms
box-lined.woff
622 ms
filled.woff
607 ms
round-filled.woff
605 ms
round-lined.woff
681 ms
box-filled.woff
658 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
80 ms
dentaltease.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
dentaltease.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
dentaltease.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dentaltease.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dentaltease.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dentaltease.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dentaltease. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: