2.5 sec in total
54 ms
1.5 sec
883 ms
Click here to check amazing DI Sqr content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about disqr.com
Make Data Driven Decisions Today with DI Squared. Explore our Data Integration and Visualization Offerings. Request a Demo.
Visit disqr.comWe analyzed Disqr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
disqr.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value5.4 s
57/100
10%
Value2,040 ms
7/100
30%
Value1.684
0/100
15%
Value18.8 s
3/100
10%
54 ms
79 ms
31 ms
70 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Disqr.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Pixel-geo.prfct.co and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (723 ms) belongs to the original domain Disqr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 204.1 kB (8%)
2.5 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Disqr.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 157.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 157.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. DI Sqr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 43 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Disqr.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 85 (88%)
97
12
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DI Sqr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
disqr.com
54 ms
disqr.com
79 ms
sgr.css
31 ms
frontend.min.css
70 ms
css
105 ms
style.min.css
57 ms
htbbootstrap.css
60 ms
font-awesome.min.css
77 ms
animation.css
83 ms
htmega-keyframes.css
102 ms
astra-addon-63ca3867ac3719-23832773.css
98 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
102 ms
frontend.min.css
87 ms
swiper.min.css
109 ms
post-1.css
106 ms
slick-carousal.css
110 ms
all.css
107 ms
solid.min.css
113 ms
frontend.min.css
114 ms
all.min.css
135 ms
v4-shims.min.css
140 ms
global.css
143 ms
post-98.css
147 ms
post-2086.css
150 ms
ekiticons.css
153 ms
widget-styles.css
163 ms
responsive.css
195 ms
css
101 ms
fontawesome.min.css
189 ms
regular.min.css
197 ms
solid.min.css
188 ms
brands.min.css
195 ms
sgr.js
207 ms
jquery.min.js
231 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
208 ms
core.min.js
207 ms
slick.js
209 ms
custom-tm.js
209 ms
v4-shims.min.js
209 ms
js
128 ms
8935903.js
145 ms
api.js
93 ms
animations.min.css
205 ms
email-decode.min.js
195 ms
frontend.min.js
158 ms
popper.min.js
154 ms
htbbootstrap.js
155 ms
waypoints.js
143 ms
astra-addon-63ca3867ad74b5-20250711.js
136 ms
frontend-script.js
122 ms
widget-scripts.js
121 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
122 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
119 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
115 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
118 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
116 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
347 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
101 ms
hooks.min.js
99 ms
i18n.min.js
317 ms
frontend.min.js
311 ms
waypoints.min.js
311 ms
swiper.min.js
311 ms
share-link.min.js
309 ms
dialog.min.js
300 ms
frontend.min.js
272 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
270 ms
animate-circle.js
267 ms
elementor.js
269 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
259 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
306 ms
ss.js
333 ms
hotjar-3324439.js
332 ms
desktop-di-logo-67x56.png
222 ms
graphic-progress-chart-1714230.jpg
223 ms
qlik-sense-768x553.png
291 ms
MicrosoftTeams-image-6-768x512.png
292 ms
manufacturing-wp.jpeg
292 ms
turnover-business-sales-3966586-p5szp7lag1zcb5ksi33v2zt7m3lsn6v44sh1fyf8lc.jpg
221 ms
Customer-Map-1024x576.png
497 ms
data-image-1024x333.png
473 ms
font
226 ms
astra.woff
80 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
81 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
196 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
723 ms
eicons.woff
226 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
263 ms
collectedforms.js
340 ms
fb.js
272 ms
8935903.js
340 ms
8935903.js
340 ms
recaptcha__en.js
179 ms
modules.a02b08e96dea6b9516bd.js
118 ms
koi
160 ms
6388c07971a8ade4a2000cc7.js
43 ms
tagjs
3 ms
49 ms
adsct
145 ms
tap.php
51 ms
pixel
66 ms
sd
38 ms
pixel
15 ms
cb
3 ms
3 ms
bounce
63 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
42 ms
cb
19 ms
disqr.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
disqr.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
disqr.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Disqr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Disqr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
disqr.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of DI Sqr. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: