2.9 sec in total
42 ms
2.5 sec
388 ms
Welcome to dunvegangroup.com homepage info - get ready to check Dunvegan Group best content right away, or after learning these important things about dunvegangroup.com
Business Retention & Loyalty Specialist – Discover our comprehensive approach to improving customer and employee retention.
Visit dunvegangroup.comWe analyzed Dunvegangroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
dunvegangroup.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value3.5 s
64/100
25%
Value2.9 s
94/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.073
96/100
15%
Value3.3 s
94/100
10%
42 ms
1214 ms
231 ms
176 ms
179 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Dunvegangroup.com, 79% (72 requests) were made to Thedunvegangroup.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Thedunvegangroup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (56%)
2.8 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Dunvegangroup.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dunvegan Group images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 757.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 757.4 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 724.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dunvegangroup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 724.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (79%)
87
18
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dunvegan Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dunvegangroup.com
42 ms
thedunvegangroup.com
1214 ms
style.min.css
231 ms
shortcodes.css
176 ms
styles.css
179 ms
nectar-slider.css
293 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
177 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
297 ms
style.css
235 ms
grid-system.css
295 ms
style.css
524 ms
header-layout-menu-left-aligned.css
289 ms
element-testimonial.css
295 ms
owl-carousel.css
347 ms
element-recent-posts.css
352 ms
cf7.css
351 ms
css
32 ms
responsive.css
408 ms
ascend.css
353 ms
menu-dynamic.css
404 ms
js_composer.min.css
466 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
532 ms
style.css
410 ms
css
42 ms
jquery.min.js
462 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
464 ms
js
67 ms
js
46 ms
style-non-critical.css
418 ms
magnific.css
480 ms
core.css
481 ms
core.min.js
481 ms
menu.min.js
516 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
569 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
570 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
570 ms
dom-ready.min.js
571 ms
hooks.min.js
572 ms
i18n.min.js
572 ms
a11y.min.js
650 ms
autocomplete.min.js
651 ms
3446768.js
97 ms
api.js
51 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
650 ms
index.js
533 ms
index.js
530 ms
anime.min.js
531 ms
nectar-slider.js
598 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
505 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
451 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
446 ms
priority.js
444 ms
nectar-slider-priority.js
441 ms
transit.min.js
531 ms
waypoints.js
480 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
475 ms
hoverintent.min.js
475 ms
magnific.js
471 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
480 ms
touchswipe.min.js
475 ms
nectar-testimonial-slider.js
475 ms
superfish.js
423 ms
init.js
646 ms
index.js
422 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
482 ms
gtm.js
65 ms
bg-sec1.png
444 ms
logo.png
385 ms
Anne_Miner_2022_WEBRESOLUTION_cropped2.jpg
389 ms
invest-in-your-company-culture-1200x675-1-600x403.png
566 ms
Customer-Care-600x403.jpg
445 ms
electrical-utility-employee-in-cherry-picker-repairing-electrical-wiring-connection-600x403.jpeg
391 ms
logo-footer.png
390 ms
square-l.png
446 ms
square-r.png
446 ms
square-w.png
447 ms
bg-testi.jpg
446 ms
square-rb.png
507 ms
bg-blogtxt.png
430 ms
js
112 ms
analytics.js
17 ms
font
160 ms
icomoon.woff
398 ms
collect
70 ms
3446768.js
132 ms
3446768.js
174 ms
conversations-embed.js
114 ms
collectedforms.js
101 ms
collect
80 ms
ga-audiences
15 ms
recaptcha__en.js
77 ms
dunvegangroup.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
dunvegangroup.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
dunvegangroup.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dunvegangroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dunvegangroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dunvegangroup.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dunvegan Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: