6.4 sec in total
381 ms
5.1 sec
940 ms
Click here to check amazing Corp Ezetap content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about corp.ezetap.com
Ezetap offers smart payment solution for businesses to accept any mode of payment from their customers. It also provides POS machine for accepting payments digitally with other merchant services to me...
Visit corp.ezetap.comWe analyzed Corp.ezetap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 381 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
corp.ezetap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value16.8 s
0/100
10%
Value20,510 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.063
97/100
15%
Value29.7 s
0/100
10%
381 ms
969 ms
374 ms
755 ms
584 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Corp.ezetap.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Corp.ezetap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 72.1 kB (4%)
1.8 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Corp.ezetap.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.8 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Corp Ezetap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 25 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Corp.ezetap.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (39%)
95
58
The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Corp Ezetap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
corp.ezetap.com
381 ms
corp.ezetap.com
969 ms
bootstrap.min.css
374 ms
style.css
755 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
584 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
596 ms
animate.css
588 ms
masonry.css
592 ms
bootstrap-datetimepicker.css
580 ms
font-awesome.min.css
61 ms
sharethis.js
45 ms
waitMe.css
941 ms
api.js
65 ms
jquery.min.js
997 ms
bootstrap.min.js
827 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
1040 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
801 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
994 ms
tabcollapse.js
1066 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1038 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
993 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
1252 ms
modernizr.custom.26633.js
1247 ms
jquery.gridrotator.js
1248 ms
custom-script.js
1248 ms
moment.js
1551 ms
bootstrap-datetimepicker.js
1295 ms
script.js
1538 ms
Tracker.js
1297 ms
gtm.js
429 ms
desk-nav-17-08-2022.png
1082 ms
mob-nav-17-08-2022.png
852 ms
logo2.png
823 ms
head-down.png
821 ms
Banner-4-05.jpg
1263 ms
play.png
1080 ms
Ezetap_Banner_Desktop.jpg
1449 ms
number-banner-desk.jpg
1959 ms
Banner-4-05-mobile.jpg
1104 ms
Ezetap_Banner_Mobile.jpg
1593 ms
number-banner-mob.jpg
1599 ms
reliance.png
1283 ms
airtel.png
1449 ms
bajaj.png
1483 ms
amazon.png
1597 ms
indane.png
1603 ms
ladder.png
1672 ms
fedex.png
1784 ms
basket.png
1806 ms
recaptcha__en.js
487 ms
w_1.png
1768 ms
color_2.png
1730 ms
w_2.png
1756 ms
color_1.png
1706 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
257 ms
w_3.png
1708 ms
color_3.png
1665 ms
img1.png
1854 ms
img1-xs.png
1895 ms
img2.png
1797 ms
img4.jpg
1805 ms
conversion_async.js
273 ms
analytics.js
482 ms
fbevents.js
477 ms
insight.min.js
473 ms
img4-xs.jpg
1828 ms
img5.png
1641 ms
youtube1.png
1764 ms
youtube1-xs.png
1770 ms
youtube2.png
1785 ms
297 ms
youtube2-xs.png
1732 ms
cnbc-make-it.png
1597 ms
history.png
1680 ms
cnbc.png
1684 ms
fallback
116 ms
fallback
167 ms
bbc.png
1549 ms
collect
74 ms
identity.js
39 ms
301694373554118
118 ms
cb.png
1470 ms
economic.png
1527 ms
fallback__ltr.css
44 ms
toi.png
1616 ms
87 ms
collect
169 ms
css
141 ms
1858701697521391
59 ms
icon-mail.svg
1458 ms
logo_48.png
14 ms
sisa.png
1444 ms
logo-footer.png
1288 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
82 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
90 ms
loader.gif
1286 ms
cancel.svg
1324 ms
36 ms
fancybox_loading.gif
1317 ms
bg-patt.png
1309 ms
corp.ezetap.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
corp.ezetap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
corp.ezetap.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Corp.ezetap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Corp.ezetap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
corp.ezetap.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Corp Ezetap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: