7.2 sec in total
248 ms
6.7 sec
304 ms
Click here to check amazing Effect content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about effect.org.uk
Atari ST Demo and Packing Crew
Visit effect.org.ukWe analyzed Effect.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
effect.org.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.374
28/100
15%
Value8.2 s
41/100
10%
248 ms
699 ms
226 ms
557 ms
404 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Effect.org.uk, 65% (26 requests) were made to Nameserve.org and 13% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (741 ms) relates to the external source Nameserve.org.
Page size can be reduced by 541.7 kB (31%)
1.8 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Effect.org.uk main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Effect images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 215.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 215.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 262.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Effect.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 262.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (79%)
33
7
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Effect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
effect.org.uk
248 ms
www.nameserve.org
699 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
226 ms
integrity-light.css
557 ms
integrity-light.css
404 ms
css
55 ms
css
72 ms
dashicons.min.css
401 ms
admin-bar.min.css
322 ms
colors.min.css
257 ms
jetpack.css
384 ms
jquery.js
573 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
405 ms
x-head.min.js
468 ms
cs-head.min.js
566 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
423 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
426 ms
woocommerce.min.js
492 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
507 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
508 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
21 ms
gprofiles.js
158 ms
wpgroho.js
586 ms
x-body.min.js
587 ms
comment-reply.min.js
587 ms
cs-body.min.js
741 ms
wp-embed.min.js
592 ms
e-201613.js
19 ms
nameserve.gif
91 ms
servers.jpg
611 ms
warehouse.jpg
201 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nIU_FpLvXrv7la5ElqLzFTw.ttf
29 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nG9QJ2ZrAngtF2xl-5ukicw.ttf
42 ms
5M21SdFLkD52QavfmHs6cA.ttf
48 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
60 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
254 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJfqEJM-AK1nFUafhVdytxUY.ttf
59 ms
hovercard.css
36 ms
services.css
72 ms
g.gif
15 ms
effect.org.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
effect.org.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
effect.org.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Effect.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Effect.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
effect.org.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Effect. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: