7.9 sec in total
2.3 sec
5.2 sec
411 ms
Click here to check amazing Electrical Review content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about electricalreview.co.uk
Electrical Review is the number one source for the latest news and thought leadership covering the UK's electrical sector.
Visit electricalreview.co.ukWe analyzed Electricalreview.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
electricalreview.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value20.4 s
0/100
25%
Value17.0 s
0/100
10%
Value1,840 ms
9/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.7 s
2/100
10%
2256 ms
497 ms
155 ms
157 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 121 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Electricalreview.co.uk, 11% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to A.collective-media.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Electricalreview.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (45%)
6.2 MB
3.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Electricalreview.co.uk main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 178.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Electrical Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 804.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 804.2 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 539.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Electricalreview.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 539.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (61%)
105
41
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Electrical Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
electricalreview.co.uk
2256 ms
bootstrap.css
497 ms
style.css
155 ms
style.css
157 ms
style.css
160 ms
style.css
160 ms
system.css
306 ms
legacy-grid.css
308 ms
font-awesome.min.css
385 ms
template.css
616 ms
off-canvas.css
449 ms
font-awesome.min.css
538 ms
custom.css
460 ms
template.css
540 ms
style.css
602 ms
script.js
612 ms
script.js
644 ms
jquery.min.js
919 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
690 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
752 ms
script.js
762 ms
script.js
763 ms
bootstrap.js
948 ms
jquery.tap.min.js
840 ms
off-canvas.js
905 ms
script.js
916 ms
menu.js
916 ms
jquery.ckie.js
992 ms
script.js
1056 ms
script.js
1068 ms
css
24 ms
css
37 ms
css
46 ms
addthis_widget.js
8 ms
delivery.js
54 ms
system.css
772 ms
gpt.js
81 ms
ga.js
79 ms
mqdefault.jpg
130 ms
logo2-dcp.png
290 ms
ER_logo_black.png
129 ms
ER_small_black.png
207 ms
rsz_16criticalpower.png
1297 ms
Urmet.jpg
851 ms
Martindale.jpg
846 ms
enclosures.png
282 ms
BIM.jpg
280 ms
Stego1.jpg
450 ms
Scolmore2.jpg
464 ms
er-tv.png
557 ms
83jtl.jpg
846 ms
Urmet.jpg
886 ms
Martindale.jpg
1028 ms
Stego1.jpg
1108 ms
rsz_201501_eppecx_korbach_eng.jpg
1148 ms
Megger4.png
1279 ms
edieLivelogo.jpg
1188 ms
data-centre-summit-logo-north-2016.jpeg
1376 ms
CWIEMEBerlin2016.jpg
2051 ms
flex.jpg
1301 ms
Kocos-2.png
1426 ms
rsz_16criticalpower.png
1509 ms
Urmet.jpg
1447 ms
Twitter-trans.png
1453 ms
ER_logo_white.png
1527 ms
mqdefault.jpg
128 ms
mqdefault.jpg
195 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
49 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
20 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
23 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
91 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nCSLrGe-fkSRw2DeVgOoWcQ.woff
90 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsFzqCfRpIA3W6ypxnPISCPA.woff
91 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1628 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJTqR_3kx9_hJXbbyU8S6IN0.woff
63 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37ZobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
63 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJR_xHqYgAV9Bl_ZQbYUxnQU.woff
63 ms
ads
92 ms
container.html
51 ms
qYmAstpg4FY
243 ms
bg-stripes.png
1375 ms
arrow-section.gif
1396 ms
7m8l7TlFO-S3VkhHuR0at4bN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
9 ms
1pO9eUAp8pSF8VnRTP3xnvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
9 ms
t6Nd4cfPRhZP44Q5QAjcC4bN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
9 ms
get-loader
62 ms
17899028988160003971
156 ms
ads
115 ms
osd.js
107 ms
widgets.js
104 ms
300lo.json
60 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
98 ms
www-embed-player.js
127 ms
base.js
286 ms
3122283734516852409
104 ms
ads
101 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
72 ms
my-wisepop
376 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
219 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
69 ms
datapair
280 ms
15734727563600586492
368 ms
datapair
272 ms
datapair
271 ms
datapair
272 ms
syndication
158 ms
544896469078401024
207 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
75 ms
ad_status.js
73 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
54 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
53 ms
pixel
19 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
3 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
5 ms
WIwM6-zN_normal.jpg
40 ms
Cdq-utXW8AA2y2X.jpg:small
38 ms
jot
21 ms
activeview
16 ms
activeview
18 ms
polyfills.js
8 ms
electricalreview.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
electricalreview.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
electricalreview.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Electricalreview.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Electricalreview.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
electricalreview.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Electrical Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: