4 sec in total
266 ms
3.4 sec
343 ms
Click here to check amazing Electronic Fog content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about electronicfog.com
For information about electronic fog and the Bermuda Triangle, read the story of Bruce Gernon covered in THE FOG book.
Visit electronicfog.comWe analyzed Electronicfog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 266 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
electronicfog.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value4.3 s
75/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.108
88/100
15%
Value8.8 s
36/100
10%
266 ms
462 ms
674 ms
569 ms
631 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Electronicfog.com, 43% (9 requests) were made to Le-cdn.website-editor.net and 19% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.website-editor.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Le-cdn.website-editor.net.
Page size can be reduced by 214.9 kB (25%)
869.1 kB
654.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Electronicfog.com main page is 869.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 539.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 129.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Electronic Fog needs image optimization as it can save up to 129.4 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 120 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 691 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Electronicfog.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (29%)
17
12
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Electronic Fog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
electronicfog.com
266 ms
electronicfog.com
462 ms
www.electronicfog.com
674 ms
Screen+Shot+2020-03-09+at+6.24.02+PM-1920w.png
569 ms
Electronic+Fog+-05-288w.png
631 ms
css2
131 ms
d-css-runtime-desktop-one-package-structured-global.min.css
91 ms
6dd19a61387af7da6fd88f4ee7d1d91e.css
125 ms
4e1042159807447397bb01ba17659108_withFlex_1.min.css
111 ms
1and1-runtime.css
149 ms
4e1042159807447397bb01ba17659108_home_withFlex_1.min.css
111 ms
jquery.min.js
123 ms
d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js
130 ms
Ms.+Lynn+Gernon-001-1920w.jpg
800 ms
Ms.-Lynn-Gernon-0021-1920w.jpg
1968 ms
Ms.-Lynn-Gernon-0021-717w.jpg
717 ms
THumbnail+3-789w.png
944 ms
Ms.+Lynn+Gernon-001-1920w.jpg
1094 ms
Ms.-Lynn-Gernon-0021-1920w.jpg
1060 ms
Ms.-Lynn-Gernon-005-1920w.jpg
1258 ms
dm-common-icons.ttf
2 ms
electronicfog.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
electronicfog.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
electronicfog.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Electronicfog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Electronicfog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
electronicfog.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Electronic Fog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: