2.2 sec in total
130 ms
1.9 sec
173 ms
Visit energy-startups.energytechreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Energy Startups Tech Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about energy-startups.energytechreview.com
Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that aggregates the brightest of minds, expert opinions, latest energy technologies news, analyses, and argument about the critical issues that exist...
Visit energy-startups.energytechreview.comWe analyzed Energy-startups.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 130 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
energy-startups.energytechreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value5.4 s
57/100
10%
Value1,660 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.244
51/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
130 ms
693 ms
308 ms
245 ms
267 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Energy-startups.energytechreview.com, 49% (39 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (693 ms) belongs to the original domain Energy-startups.energytechreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 182.9 kB (17%)
1.0 MB
866.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Energy-startups.energytechreview.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 643.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Energy Startups Tech Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 63.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 55.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Energy-startups.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.3 kB or 57% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (65%)
69
24
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Energy Startups Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
energy-startups.energytechreview.com
130 ms
energy-startups.energytechreview.com
693 ms
bootstrap.css
308 ms
font-awesome.min.css
245 ms
animate.css
267 ms
owl.carousel.css
271 ms
owl.theme.default.css
283 ms
normalize.css
282 ms
slicknav.min.css
301 ms
style1.css
119 ms
main.css
329 ms
responsive.css
330 ms
modernizr-3.5.0.min.js
348 ms
css
43 ms
css
62 ms
css
72 ms
js
88 ms
gpt.js
292 ms
adsbygoogle.js
546 ms
element.js
81 ms
new_region.css
377 ms
style.css
126 ms
jQuery.verticalCarousel.css
156 ms
jquery.min.js
36 ms
jQuery.verticalCarousel.js
185 ms
jquery.flipbox.css
186 ms
cube_slider.css
188 ms
jquery.flipbox.js
189 ms
jquery.min.js
455 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
385 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
385 ms
jquery.slicknav.min.js
385 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
455 ms
main.js
453 ms
smart-sticky.js
454 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.js
489 ms
jquery_cookie.js
489 ms
custom.js
670 ms
jquery.easy-ticker.js
671 ms
analytics.js
173 ms
gpt.js
356 ms
atrk.js
67 ms
Final-Logo.png
137 ms
load.gif
354 ms
450x308_q7t8.jpg
353 ms
450x308_Imiu.jpg
353 ms
bmjerenergy300400.jpg
353 ms
nqy904.webp
438 ms
delts300.jpg
425 ms
450x308_J0cx.jpg
426 ms
450x308_wQcZ.jpg
437 ms
450x308_6o8q.jpg
436 ms
cfxokenergy300ranking.jpg
438 ms
450x308_A1O7.jpg
506 ms
450x308_165C.webp
506 ms
450x308_os9A.jpg
507 ms
x.png
507 ms
linkedin_cirr.png
168 ms
pubads_impl.js
109 ms
jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zI.ttf
164 ms
jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q14.ttf
213 ms
jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q14.ttf
234 ms
css
181 ms
font-awesome.min.css
205 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf
200 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
336 ms
collect
183 ms
show_ads_impl.js
483 ms
zrt_lookup_nohtml.html
191 ms
ads
89 ms
container.html
86 ms
js
130 ms
icon-up.png
88 ms
1261171924365000533
148 ms
icon.png
148 ms
abg_lite.js
147 ms
window_focus.js
147 ms
ufs_web_display.js
56 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
100 ms
energy-startups.energytechreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
energy-startups.energytechreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
energy-startups.energytechreview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Energy-startups.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Energy-startups.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
energy-startups.energytechreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Energy Startups Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: