2.3 sec in total
144 ms
1.8 sec
316 ms
Click here to check amazing Energy Tech Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about energytechreview.com
Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that aggregates the brightest of minds, expert opinions, latest energy technologies news, analyses, and argument about the critical issues that exist...
Visit energytechreview.comWe analyzed Energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
energytechreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value3,620 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.782
5/100
15%
Value15.9 s
6/100
10%
144 ms
265 ms
530 ms
127 ms
175 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Energytechreview.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (530 ms) belongs to the original domain Energytechreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 194.8 kB (16%)
1.2 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Energytechreview.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 571.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Energy Tech Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 61.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.4 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.9 kB or 55% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (50%)
80
40
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Energy Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
energytechreview.com
144 ms
energytechreview.com
265 ms
www.energytechreview.com
530 ms
bootstrap.css
127 ms
font-awesome.min.css
175 ms
animate.css
189 ms
owl.carousel.css
183 ms
owl.theme.default.css
192 ms
normalize.css
199 ms
slicknav.min.css
199 ms
style1.css
231 ms
main.css
246 ms
responsive.css
252 ms
modernizr-3.5.0.min.js
251 ms
css
45 ms
css
60 ms
css
64 ms
js
71 ms
gpt.js
69 ms
adsbygoogle.js
85 ms
element.js
68 ms
new_region.css
369 ms
style.css
314 ms
jQuery.verticalCarousel.css
315 ms
jquery.min.js
18 ms
jQuery.verticalCarousel.js
374 ms
jquery.min.js
373 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
374 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
373 ms
jquery.slicknav.min.js
374 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
373 ms
main.js
409 ms
smart-sticky.js
407 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.js
410 ms
jquery_cookie.js
409 ms
custom.js
408 ms
jquery.easy-ticker.js
410 ms
analytics.js
190 ms
gpt.js
266 ms
atrk.js
152 ms
Final-Logo.png
312 ms
load.gif
311 ms
370x420_WRX8.jpg
310 ms
370x420_25LF.jpg
310 ms
370x420_sI45.jpg
317 ms
370x420_DmAw.jpg
317 ms
370x420_ys59.jpg
360 ms
370x420_1f0k.jpg
359 ms
42c7x750.jpg
359 ms
c5ao750513.jpg
359 ms
z1okr450-Recovered.jpg
394 ms
450x308_xA7r.jpg
393 ms
450x308_1Z86.jpg
393 ms
450x308_8Vox.jpg
398 ms
450x308_fDc6.jpg
399 ms
450x308_FN3V.jpg
486 ms
450x308_S0B3.232
487 ms
450x308_D03A.jpg
487 ms
450x308_8WfN.jpg
487 ms
450x308_7xSU.jpg
488 ms
pubads_impl.js
132 ms
450x308_7AF5.jpg
398 ms
450x308_04v7.jpg
433 ms
450x308_9R42.jpg
437 ms
450x308_49qZ.jpg
381 ms
450x308_H3NR.jpg
379 ms
450x308_FqZW.jpg
378 ms
450x308_Lqe9.webp
378 ms
450x308_1342.jpg
406 ms
1g7kppG300350.jpg
435 ms
font
149 ms
35vejenergy300350.jpg
443 ms
linkedin_cirr.png
403 ms
x.png
400 ms
css
119 ms
font-awesome.min.css
129 ms
font
125 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
401 ms
collect
108 ms
ads
100 ms
container.html
91 ms
js
75 ms
icon-up.png
224 ms
16342652913652215187
109 ms
abg_lite.js
97 ms
window_focus.js
96 ms
15080747596635452987
89 ms
icon.png
159 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
62 ms
energytechreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
energytechreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
energytechreview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
energytechreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Energy Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: