4.1 sec in total
88 ms
3.4 sec
558 ms
Welcome to engenio.us homepage info - get ready to check Engenio best content right away, or after learning these important things about engenio.us
We're a creative engineering firm specializing in electronic medical device design. We develop technology products that solve problems. Visit our site today!
Visit engenio.usWe analyzed Engenio.us page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
engenio.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.5 s
0/100
10%
Value14.0 s
0/100
25%
Value24.4 s
0/100
10%
Value23,900 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.058
98/100
15%
Value40.2 s
0/100
10%
88 ms
321 ms
173 ms
399 ms
455 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Engenio.us, 74% (79 requests) were made to Secureservercdn.net and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (864 ms) relates to the external source Secureservercdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 160.2 kB (14%)
1.2 MB
995.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Engenio.us main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 510.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 116.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Engenio images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 35.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Engenio.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 83 (85%)
98
15
The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Engenio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 44 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
engenio.us
88 ms
engenio.us
321 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
173 ms
layerslider.css
399 ms
css
455 ms
style.min.css
323 ms
default.css
390 ms
font-awesome.min.css
314 ms
team.min.css
327 ms
dashboard.css
317 ms
styles.css
451 ms
molongui-authorship.d1c4.min.css
452 ms
styles.css
451 ms
slider-templates-public.css
569 ms
style.css
495 ms
specular-wpbakery-addons-public.css
489 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
642 ms
shortcodes.css
611 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.css
602 ms
swiper.css
652 ms
animate.min.css
620 ms
hoverex-all.css
642 ms
odometer-theme-minimal.css
667 ms
style.css
710 ms
style.css
692 ms
bootstrap.css
742 ms
flexslider.css
661 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
624 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
771 ms
vector-icons.css
773 ms
font-awesome.min.css
766 ms
linecon.css
782 ms
steadysets.css
784 ms
style.min.css
828 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
832 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
835 ms
frontend.min.css
864 ms
post-7735.css
844 ms
all.min.css
850 ms
css
543 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
610 ms
js
820 ms
index.php
95 ms
css
582 ms
conversion.js
713 ms
v4-shims.min.css
746 ms
global.css
588 ms
js_composer.min.css
635 ms
style.min.css
661 ms
rs6.css
657 ms
post-like.js
652 ms
layerslider.utils.js
761 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
668 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
564 ms
rbtools.min.js
739 ms
rs6.min.js
667 ms
slider-templates-public.js
667 ms
codeless-main.js
689 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
625 ms
jquery.appear.js
615 ms
specular-wpbakery-addons-public.js
594 ms
picturefill.min.js
622 ms
css
470 ms
v4-shims.min.js
610 ms
team.min.js
729 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
716 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
680 ms
index.js
653 ms
molongui-authorship.5a1d.min.js
619 ms
bootstrap.min.js
617 ms
jquery.easing.1.1.js
578 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
576 ms
modernizr.custom.66803.js
568 ms
classie.js
569 ms
waypoints.min.js
565 ms
background-check.min.js
546 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
545 ms
happy-addons.min.js
543 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
527 ms
gtm.js
249 ms
Engenious-Color-Logo-01.png
150 ms
horizontal-logo-dark-Backgound.png
148 ms
P1100818.jpg
156 ms
Live-Code-Slider.jpg
154 ms
Med-Device6.jpg
151 ms
200 ms
moon.svg
85 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
84 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
208 ms
steadysets.ttf
78 ms
linecons.ttf
78 ms
analytics.js
33 ms
fbevents.js
174 ms
app.js
261 ms
collect
37 ms
collect
121 ms
identity.js
60 ms
376071676247298
290 ms
ga-audiences
234 ms
collect
170 ms
179 ms
insight.min.js
230 ms
swiper.min.js
97 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.1.0-packed.js
153 ms
gtm.js
116 ms
66 ms
22 ms
engenio.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
engenio.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
engenio.us SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Engenio.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Engenio.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
engenio.us
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Engenio. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: