5.6 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.9 sec
389 ms
Welcome to engineeringshopper.com homepage info - get ready to check Engineering Shopper best content right away, or after learning these important things about engineeringshopper.com
This blog is all about posting content for the handy-man who loves fixing up his own house and loves DIY tips. Working in the industrial engineering and civil engineering industries for many years has...
Visit engineeringshopper.comWe analyzed Engineeringshopper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
engineeringshopper.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value4.2 s
44/100
25%
Value21.2 s
0/100
10%
Value16,330 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.101
89/100
15%
Value23.8 s
1/100
10%
1245 ms
370 ms
36 ms
368 ms
188 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Engineeringshopper.com, 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Engineeringshopper.com.
Page size can be reduced by 243.2 kB (14%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Engineeringshopper.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 180.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 180.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 344 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Engineering Shopper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 42.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.9 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Engineeringshopper.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (71%)
38
11
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Engineering Shopper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
engineeringshopper.com
1245 ms
www.engineeringshopper.com
370 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
36 ms
style.min.css
368 ms
wp-show-posts-min.css
188 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
189 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
206 ms
rgs.css
240 ms
font-awesome.min.css
359 ms
style.css
892 ms
magnific.css
370 ms
responsive.css
629 ms
skin-material.css
642 ms
js_composer.min.css
861 ms
css
46 ms
jquery.min.js
379 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
380 ms
modernizr.js
388 ms
f9060c5b27b4313f149bb24d643fe075
59 ms
lifting-sheet-metal-with-crane.jpg
854 ms
smart-tv-remote2.jpg
543 ms
magnific.js
559 ms
isotope.min.js
571 ms
superfish.js
580 ms
init.js
614 ms
infinitescroll.js
604 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1037 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
816 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
642 ms
flickity.min.js
1035 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1189 ms
stickkit.js
834 ms
touchswipe.min.js
848 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
850 ms
managers2.jpg
1871 ms
micro-service-1024x683.jpg
1354 ms
AdobeStock_106538564-welding-300x157.jpg
1133 ms
AdobeStock_116518387-milling-300x200.jpg
1187 ms
www.engineeringshopper.com
734 ms
construction-2.jpg
785 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
556 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
679 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
680 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
682 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
554 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
678 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k30e4.woff
681 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTQ3iQ.woff
730 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3iQ.woff
732 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff
731 ms
icomoon.woff
990 ms
engineeringshopper.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
engineeringshopper.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
engineeringshopper.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Engineeringshopper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Engineeringshopper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
engineeringshopper.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Engineering Shopper. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: