4.1 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.8 sec
114 ms
Click here to check amazing Enxetic content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about enxetic.com
The Compute Engine has cloud data centre locations in the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States to ensure multiple redundancy.
Visit enxetic.comWe analyzed Enxetic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
enxetic.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value160 ms
93/100
30%
Value1.292
1/100
15%
Value10.5 s
23/100
10%
1196 ms
222 ms
591 ms
223 ms
734 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Enxetic.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Enxetic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 550.3 kB (53%)
1.0 MB
484.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Enxetic.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 368.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Enxetic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 193.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 193.3 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 314.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Enxetic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 314.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (53%)
57
27
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Enxetic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
enxetic.com
1196 ms
jsystem.css
222 ms
bootstrap.css
591 ms
superfish.css
223 ms
template.css
734 ms
updates.css
230 ms
custom.css
232 ms
css
23 ms
css
35 ms
settings.css
334 ms
creative_slider.css
338 ms
jquery.min.js
566 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
349 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
434 ms
bootstrap.min.js
449 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.js
473 ms
plugins.js
540 ms
superfish_menu.js
558 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
599 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1022 ms
parallax.js
660 ms
enxetic_script.js
679 ms
prettyPhoto.css
688 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
715 ms
ga.js
22 ms
speech-bubble-icon-48.png
265 ms
enxetic_logo.png
100 ms
glare-effect.png
127 ms
slide_blank.png
128 ms
slide_bg.png
301 ms
slide_gears_1.png
108 ms
slide_gears_2.png
118 ms
slide_gears_3.png
200 ms
slide_gears_4.png
211 ms
slide_gears_5.png
229 ms
slide_gears_6.png
236 ms
slide_gears_7.png
243 ms
slide_gears_8.png
299 ms
slide_gears_9.png
310 ms
slide_gears_10.png
343 ms
slide_gears_11.png
342 ms
slide_gears_12.png
353 ms
slide_gears_13.png
394 ms
slide_gears_14.png
400 ms
slide_gears_15.png
410 ms
slide_gears_16.png
452 ms
timer.png
473 ms
featured_blank.png
475 ms
social-icons-sprite.png
489 ms
arrow_totop.png
493 ms
zVNYSiZsJM47m1nYH8STEg.ttf
50 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
loader.gif
453 ms
spark2.png
508 ms
spark3.png
529 ms
spark6.png
532 ms
spark4.png
536 ms
spark5.png
541 ms
spark.png
553 ms
enxetic.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
enxetic.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
enxetic.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enxetic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enxetic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
enxetic.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Enxetic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: