26.7 sec in total
440 ms
14.5 sec
11.8 sec
Click here to check amazing EPassenger content for Bangladesh. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about epassenger.net
ePassenger© - The Ultimate Internet and Mobile eTicketing and eCommerce Product
Visit epassenger.netWe analyzed Epassenger.net page load time and found that the first response time was 440 ms and then it took 26.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
epassenger.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value4.7 s
34/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value420 ms
66/100
30%
Value0.131
81/100
15%
Value10.9 s
21/100
10%
440 ms
419 ms
218 ms
418 ms
591 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Epassenger.net, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Transitfunding.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Epassenger.net.
Page size can be reduced by 835.5 kB (53%)
1.6 MB
727.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Epassenger.net main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 582.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.4 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EPassenger images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 420.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 420.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 359.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epassenger.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 359.7 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (79%)
47
10
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EPassenger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
epassenger.net
440 ms
bootstrap.min.css
419 ms
css
218 ms
animate.css
418 ms
magnific-popup.css
591 ms
navstylechange.css
487 ms
settings-hideo.css
896 ms
nekoAnim.css
959 ms
owl.carousel.css
881 ms
owl.transitions.css
720 ms
owl.theme.css
1649 ms
style.css
1648 ms
custom-icons.css
1220 ms
custom-icons-ie7.css
1611 ms
layout.css
943 ms
green.css
1634 ms
custom.css
1685 ms
modernizr-2.6.1.min.js
1920 ms
classic-081711.css
3758 ms
mc-signup.css
3299 ms
respond.min.js
3320 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
3320 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.min.js
3318 ms
bootstrap.js
3319 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
3825 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
3824 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
3823 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
3823 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
4016 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
3823 ms
jquery.form.js
4202 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
4202 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
4202 ms
jquery.appear.js
4200 ms
toucheffects.js
4200 ms
custom.js
4233 ms
ABAlogoTagWeb.jpg
1158 ms
epassenger-main-logo.png
1044 ms
epassenger-logo-big.png
995 ms
apple-store.png
994 ms
google-play.png
994 ms
web-us-comb.png
995 ms
4ColorChromeWeb.jpg
996 ms
widgets.js
23 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
300 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
575 ms
Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
277 ms
custom-icons.woff
276 ms
analytics.js
1139 ms
WidgetScript
1496 ms
timeline.bc7ee675e57cb01f4d1e255156414e73.js
1483 ms
collect
121 ms
epassenger.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
epassenger.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
epassenger.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epassenger.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epassenger.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
epassenger.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EPassenger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: