4.6 sec in total
440 ms
3.3 sec
808 ms
Welcome to ephespage.de homepage info - get ready to check Ephespage best content right away, or after learning these important things about ephespage.de
TYPO3 Entwicklung / Upgrade / Wartung / Performanceoptimierung, WordPress Upgrade / Wartung, Webseiten DSGVO-Optimierung und Anpassung, Schnittstellen
Visit ephespage.deWe analyzed Ephespage.de page load time and found that the first response time was 440 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
ephespage.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
440 ms
475 ms
745 ms
341 ms
333 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Ephespage.de, 85% (23 requests) were made to Ephra.im and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (767 ms) relates to the external source Ephra.im.
Page size can be reduced by 26.4 kB (4%)
736.6 kB
710.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Ephespage.de main page is 736.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 682.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 117 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ephespage images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (28%)
18
13
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ephespage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ephespage.de
440 ms
ephespage.de
475 ms
ephra.im
745 ms
merged-58d420929f9fd6d2447243a01134ba46-6d3c7894a4b47b504708c66a20d73d4b.css
341 ms
merged-1e509ff6886bde1b4bbadafdf7e22c8f-326b5ba14853a9e78d9d9f88e27b7ec2.js
333 ms
merged-9403f1fb21dd7be6f6eab6c8fff30df0-fb7a3d75c5c83250c1ad5a5957be61b3.js
333 ms
merged-6f4bf2d2a78d68e9d5e0d79983f5ba4a-80188879cc2a87119aeb29bae1f7fdb4.js
703 ms
merged-6a3d01fdb703d1bc89493371b9dec443-c080bfe07174561a26982dfefb9b8299.js
632 ms
analytics.js
182 ms
webfontloader.js
169 ms
ephra.im_logo_white_loader.png
224 ms
ephra.im_logo.png
226 ms
IMG_20170513_095653.jpg
659 ms
IMG_20181103_101030_542.jpg
447 ms
IMG_20190817_101647_399.jpg
544 ms
csm_slide_01_49df6336b8.jpg
767 ms
csm_TYPO3_Association_Community_Member_364010a2a5_1f24096142.png
329 ms
csm_Dateien_auswaehlen_und_hochladen_19ee7b3882.jpg
428 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
664 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
550 ms
collect
29 ms
webfont.css
426 ms
bootstrappackageicon.min.css
534 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7j.woff
128 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdo.woff
127 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdo.woff
126 ms
bootstrappackageicon.woff
115 ms
ephespage.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ephespage.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ephespage.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ephespage.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ephespage.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ephespage.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ephespage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: