1.6 sec in total
311 ms
1.2 sec
72 ms
Visit erange.com now to see the best up-to-date Erange content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about erange.com
The eRange platform moves to disrupt the recreational and professional firearm training industries. We are transforming the century-old system of marking paper targets by delivering a state-of-the-art...
Visit erange.comWe analyzed Erange.com page load time and found that the first response time was 311 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
erange.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value4.0 s
80/100
10%
Value880 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value9.4 s
30/100
10%
311 ms
37 ms
80 ms
86 ms
76 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Erange.com, 44% (16 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Erange.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (692 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 241.8 kB (45%)
535.2 kB
293.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Erange.com main page is 535.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 295.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 226.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 226.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Erange images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 48 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (31%)
29
20
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Erange. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.erange.co
311 ms
minified.js
37 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
80 ms
polyfill.min.js
86 ms
bootstrap-features.dbbc2053.bundle.min.js
76 ms
main.c5638ec5.bundle.min.js
77 ms
lodash.min.js
52 ms
react.production.min.js
51 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
97 ms
wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js
101 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
101 ms
012087_0337d62adde346deb0bc849a596a72eaf000.jpg
193 ms
Post%20Set%20-%203%20%E2%80%93%203.png
343 ms
Group%209508.png
327 ms
012087_0ef2d2ce687b4a4491689e76d72c4dc1~mv2.gif
180 ms
Group%209489.png
246 ms
Group%209490.png
308 ms
Group%209503.png
412 ms
312723_f151d4e6a7044e598b0676818ef6e1f3~mv2.jpg
316 ms
Group%209502.png
441 ms
Group%209492.png
522 ms
Group%209493.png
606 ms
Group%209499.png
465 ms
Group%209495.png
511 ms
Group%209494.png
646 ms
Group%209500.png
692 ms
file.woff
321 ms
file.woff
329 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
1 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
4 ms
bolt-performance
27 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
6 ms
right-arrow.svg
13 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
2 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
2 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
3 ms
erange.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
erange.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
erange.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Erange.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Erange.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
erange.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Erange. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: