Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

estheteek.com

Trouve le meilleur institut de beauté à côté de chez toi !

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

405 ms

estheteek.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Estheteek content for France. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about estheteek.com

Trouvez, notez et recommandez votre esthéticienne préférée, ou au contraire incitez les internautes à ne plus jamais aller dans le salon de beauté qui vous a déçu...

Visit estheteek.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Estheteek.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

estheteek.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value35,160 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.105

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value45.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fr.estheteek.com

1046 ms

global.css

247 ms

global.js

401 ms

map.fr.js

331 ms

fr_fr_2.js

272 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Estheteek.com, 25% (13 requests) were made to Estheteek.w-static.com and 12% (6 requests) were made to Fr.estheteek.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Fr.estheteek.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 603.0 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

625.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Estheteek.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 462.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 214.3 kB

  • Original 304.4 kB
  • After minification 302.1 kB
  • After compression 90.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 214.3 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 284.0 kB
  • After minification 282.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Estheteek images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 232.5 kB

  • Original 462.5 kB
  • After minification 460.4 kB
  • After compression 230.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 232.5 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 154.7 kB

  • Original 177.1 kB
  • After minification 168.5 kB
  • After compression 22.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Estheteek.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 154.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (40%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Estheteek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

estheteek.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

estheteek.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

estheteek.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Estheteek.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Estheteek.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Estheteek. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: