2.9 sec in total
172 ms
2.1 sec
583 ms
Welcome to evaluate.com homepage info - get ready to check Evaluate best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about evaluate.com
Trusted commercial intelligence, consensus forecasts, Vantage news and analysis for pharma, biotech and medtech industry - Explore Evaluate
Visit evaluate.comWe analyzed Evaluate.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
evaluate.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value25.7 s
0/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value670 ms
44/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.3 s
2/100
10%
172 ms
285 ms
631 ms
32 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Evaluate.com, 14% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 7% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (950 ms) belongs to the original domain Evaluate.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (18%)
6.9 MB
5.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Evaluate.com main page is 6.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.3 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Evaluate needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 168 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 56 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Evaluate.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (46%)
35
19
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Evaluate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
evaluate.com
172 ms
evaluate.com
285 ms
www.evaluate.com
631 ms
google_tag.script.js
32 ms
font-awesome.min.css
50 ms
otSDKStub.js
37 ms
rlt2qgu.js
99 ms
cvl1evm.css
113 ms
sharethis.js
26 ms
css_PbT6oTgVZB-nS6rguzzMEZcYOK-ayAxIO4L4HftL27w.css
26 ms
css_uEzwiHAY8xJITOJX4-zeH51xNsfaGOVx0boGOGt8oPk.css
30 ms
6d2024f6-9298-450f-ae7d-1c83c0304cb2.json
30 ms
js_T9PV8lehQAhpWZQ-3YNfAAOXybNSH-I59pOQlV-OG-c.js
23 ms
smarttag.js
29 ms
js_lz8NN5JPPkqapIPSxNBV1LD7tzKTzArAu07-gnvAw5k.js
13 ms
location
94 ms
p.css
15 ms
norstella-colour.svg
38 ms
gtm.js
68 ms
iStock-1432955867%20%281%29.jpg
39 ms
Untitled%20design%20%2811%29_0.png
46 ms
ASH%202022%20banner_0.png
950 ms
Untitled%20design%20%289%29.png
46 ms
Untitled%20design%20%283%29.png
40 ms
iStock-1305012465.jpg
44 ms
Aleuac89hVg.jpg
89 ms
thought-leadership.png
54 ms
pharma.png
87 ms
custom-solutions.png
87 ms
evaluate_logo_white.svg
85 ms
otBannerSdk.js
17 ms
js
66 ms
analytics.js
239 ms
281 ms
insight.min.js
294 ms
d
25 ms
d
223 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
576 ms
d
222 ms
d
259 ms
collect
35 ms
35 ms
collect
27 ms
ga-audiences
28 ms
evaluate.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
evaluate.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
evaluate.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Evaluate.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Evaluate.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
evaluate.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Evaluate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: